Department of Government Extinction (DOGE) Tracker

Tracking the Dismantling of Democracy, One Act of Sabotage at a Time

Welcome to the Department of Government Extinction Tracker—your frontline record of the systematic destruction being carried out under Trump’s fascist regime. While they still call it the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), let’s be honest: this isn’t about efficiency. It’s about extinction—extinction of institutions, safeguards, and the very fabric of democratic governance.

This tracker exists to document every move, every act of sabotage, every blow to the institutions that make our government function. New actions will always be at the top so you can stay updated on how Musk, Trump, and their cronies are tearing it all down.

Configure Email Updates for the DOGE Tracker Below

Why This Matters

Fascists thrive in the shadows of chaos and disinformation. They count on us to get overwhelmed, to lose track, to forget just how much damage they’re doing—because if we forget, they win. But we are #TheRelentless.

Here at The American Manifesto, we refuse to let this destruction go unnoticed. Silence is surrender—and we do not surrender. We are the voice that cuts through their lies, the record that holds them accountable, and the resistance that will not be silenced.

This isn’t just about watching; it’s about fighting back. Fascists repeat their lies until they become “truth.” We repeat the truth until their lies collapse.

What You Can Do

🔥 Share this tracker. Spread it like wildfire. Let everyone know what’s happening before it’s too late.
🔥 Stay informed. Subscribe so you know the truth before they can twist it.
🔥 Amplify the fight. We don’t have billionaires or dark money backing us—we have you. And that’s all we need.

🔥 As suggested by Julia (arethusa131.bsky.social), call your Congressional Rep with every update to the tracker! 1-202-224-3121

This is an information war—and we fight to win.

If You Believe in This Fight, Help Keep It Alive

Before we get to the tracker, I need a quick moment of your time:

This work isn’t backed by corporations. There are no ads, no paywalls, no billionaires funding it.

It’s just one person, fighting like hell to expose the truth and give you the weapons to push back.

If you value this work—if you want this movement to keep growing, keep calling out fascism without fear, and keep fighting for the future we deserve—then I need your support.

Join the fight. Become a supporter. Every contribution keeps this mission alive.

Because silence is surrender. We do not surrender. We are #TheRelentless.

---

DOGE v. The US Military

📅 Date: February 21, 2025
📰 Action:

In an unprecedented military purge, President Donald Trump has fired Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff (CJCS) General Charles Q. “CQ” Brown Jr., alongside other top military officers and Judge Advocates General (JAGs) for all three military branches. The shake-up, orchestrated by Trump and Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth, has replaced career military leaders with Trump loyalists, raising grave concerns about politicization, national security, and military justice oversight.

🚨 Key Developments:

• CJCS Fired & Replaced with Trump Loyalist – General Charles Q. "CQ" Brown Jr., the first Black Chairman of the Joint Chiefs, has been abruptly dismissed. He is being replaced by retired Lt. Gen. Dan "Razin" Caine, a Trump-aligned figure with CIA ties but no experience leading the full U.S. military.

• Chief of Naval Operations Removed – Admiral Lisa Franchetti, the first woman to lead the Navy, was fired, with sources indicating her support for DEI programs made her a target.

• Vice Chief of Staff of the Air Force Ousted – General James Slife has also been dismissed, further destabilizing Air Force leadership.

• JAG Corps Purge – The Judge Advocates General (JAGs) of the Army, Navy, and Air Force have all been removed, stripping the military of its top uniformed legal oversight officers who enforce military law and accountability.

🔍 Consequences:

• Politicization of the Military – By installing loyalists in key military roles, Trump is eroding the nonpartisan nature of the U.S. armed forces, potentially transforming them into an extension of his political power.

• Loss of Experience & Stability – The mass firings eliminate battle-tested leaders with decades of experience, replacing them with figures chosen for loyalty rather than expertise.

• Legal & Ethical Dangers – The firing of all three JAGs undermines military justice oversight, increasing the risk of retaliation against dissenters, legal abuses, and the erosion of military law enforcement.

• National Security Risks – Removing top military leadership amid ongoing global tensions with China, Russia, and Iran weakens U.S. military readiness and credibility, making this move a direct threat to national security.

📌 Sources:

• Financial Times: Donald Trump fires top US military officer in Pentagon shake-up

• New York Post: Trump fires Air Force Gen. CQ Brown as chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff — and names his replacement

• Reuters: Trump fires top US general in unprecedented Pentagon shakeup

• The Atlantic: A Friday-Night Massacre at the Pentagon

DOGE v. The Constitution

🔴 UPDATE: February 22, 2025

Federal Judge Blocks Trump’s Attempt to Ban Federal DEI Programs, Citing Constitutional Violations

In a major legal victory against Trump’s authoritarian overreach, U.S. District Judge Adam Abelson has issued a preliminary injunction blocking the administration’s executive orders aimed at defunding grant recipients who engage in diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) practices. The judge ruled that the administration’s order likely constitutes viewpoint discrimination, violating First Amendment protections and the constitutional limits on executive power.

🚨 Key Developments:

• Trump’s DEI Ban Blocked – The judge ruled that the executive order targets organizations based on their speech and viewpoints, violating free speech protections under the First Amendment.

• Baltimore and Higher Ed Groups Lead the Challenge – The city of Baltimore, along with higher education organizations, sued the administration, arguing that the DEI defunding order exceeded presidential authority and unlawfully penalized institutions for supporting diversity efforts.

• AG Can Still Investigate, But Enforcement Halted – While the Attorney General retains the ability to investigate DEI practices, the court’s ruling prevents the administration from enforcing the defunding orders, ensuring that federal funds continue to support DEI initiatives.

🔍 Consequences:

• First Amendment Victory – This ruling sets a critical precedent against government efforts to punish institutions based on their viewpoints, reaffirming that the executive branch cannot dictate ideology through funding restrictions.

• Judicial Pushback on Trump’s Overreach – This decision is the latest legal setback for Trump’s administration as courts increasingly reject his unconstitutional orders, including those targeting federal workforce protections and educational programs.

• Broader Legal Challenges Incoming – This ruling invigorates ongoing lawsuits against other Trump executive orders aimed at dismantling civil rights protections, particularly within federal agencies, education, and defense programs.

📌 Sources:

• Memorandum Opinion – U.S. District Court, District of Maryland: Full Court Ruling on DEI Ban Injunction

• AP News: Judge largely blocks Trump’s executive orders ending federal support for DEI programs

• Reuters: US judge blocks Trump's bid to ban DEI by federal agencies, contractors

• Politico: Judge halts firing of intel agency personnel involved with DEI

🔴 UPDATE: February 18, 2025

In a major legal showdown over executive overreach, U.S. District Judge Tanya Chutkan has denied a temporary restraining order (TRO) sought by 14 Democratic state attorneys general to block Elon Musk’s Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) from accessing federal data and executing mass federal layoffs. However, in a critical twist, Judge Chutkan has given the plaintiffs until Wednesday, February 19, at 5:00 PM to submit additional evidence and potentially file for a preliminary injunction, which could still halt DOGE’s activities.

🚨 Key Developments:

• TRO Denied, But Case Still Alive – Chutkan ruled that the plaintiffs did not provide enough immediate evidence of irreparable harm to justify blocking DOGE’s access to federal data and employment decisions—but made clear that the issue is far from settled.

• New Deadline for Evidence – The judge has given Democratic AGs until February 19, 5 PM to submit more evidence demonstrating how DOGE’s role violates federal law and threatens data security or due process protections for federal employees.

• Musk’s Expanding Control Remains Intact—For Now – DOGE retains full access to federal agencies’ data systems and can continue laying off federal workers until further legal intervention.

🔍 Consequences:

• State AGs Must Build a Stronger Case – The next 24 hours will be crucial as the plaintiffs scramble to compile additional evidence to convince the court that Musk’s authority under DOGE is unlawful.

• Future Injunction Still Possible – If AGs present sufficient evidence, the court could issue a preliminary injunction, which would freeze DOGE’s activities while litigation continues.

• Unprecedented Power Grab Continues – The ruling allows Musk’s DOGE to maintain its grip on federal data and personnel decisions, heightening fears of political weaponization of government resources.

📌 Sources:

• Reuters: US judge will not block Elon Musk from firing federal workers, accessing data

• CNN: Judge Chutkan rejects call from Democratic AGs for temporary restraining order blocking DOGE’s access to federal data

• FedScoop: Federal judge denies request to block DOGE, Musk from seven agencies’ data systems

• Courthouse News Service: Judge rejects blue state AGs’ request to block Musk, DOGE access to federal agencies

🔴 UPDATE: February 18, 2025

In a stunning consolidation of executive power, President Donald Trump has signed an executive order declaring that only the President or the Attorney General may interpret laws executed by the executive branch. This directive effectively strips federal agencies of their authority to interpret and implement laws, forcing them to follow White House-approved legal interpretations—even in cases where those interpretations contradict precedent or existing statutory authority.

🚨 Key Developments:

• Centralizing Legal Authority – The order declares that federal agencies no longer have the power to interpret the laws they enforce, giving sole authority to Trump and Attorney General Pam Bondi.

• Undermining Agency Independence – Independent agencies, such as the Federal Election Commission, Securities and Exchange Commission, and Federal Trade Commission, must now submit significant regulatory actions to the White House Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for approval and appoint White House liaisons—giving the administration unprecedented control over agency operations.

• Expanded Presidential Power – By forcing agencies to adhere to White House legal interpretations, the order erodes long-standing legal norms and undermines the separation of powers between executive agencies and the judiciary.

🔍 Consequences:

• Weaponizing Federal Regulations – Agencies could now be forced to reinterpret laws in ways that favor political allies or target opponents, removing the neutrality that governs regulatory enforcement.

• Legal Challenges Expected – The executive order is likely to face immediate lawsuits, as it may violate the Administrative Procedure Act and encroach upon congressional authority over regulatory oversight.

• A Step Toward Autocratic Rule? – By restricting legal interpretation to just two individuals, Trump and Bondi gain unprecedented control over the enforcement of federal law, making it easier to selectively apply regulations and shield allies from accountability.

📌 Sources:

• Wall Street Journal: Trump Signs Order That Seeks White House Control Over Independent Agencies

• Washington Times: Trump signs executive orders limiting power of agencies, expanding IVF access

• Hogan Lovells: Trump Administration Issues Two Executive Orders Affecting Agency Regulations and Workforce

🔴 UPDATE: February 13, 2025
A federal judge in Massachusetts has issued a preliminary injunction blocking Trump’s executive order attempting to end birthright citizenship. This marks the fourth federal court ruling against the administration’s efforts to unilaterally strip citizenship rights from those born in the U.S.

Judge Leo Sorokin ruled that the 14th Amendment explicitly guarantees birthright citizenship, and that Trump’s order directly violates the Constitution. Similar rulings have been issued by judges in New Hampshire, Washington state, and Maryland.

📌 Sources:

• AP News: Fourth federal judge blocks Trump’s birthright citizenship order

• Reuters: Trump’s Order Curtailing US Birthright Citizenship Blocked by Fourth Federal Judge

• US District Court - Massachusetts: MEMORANDUM OF DECISION ON MOTIONS FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION

📅 Date: January 20, 2025
📰 Action:
On Trump’s first day in office, he signed an executive order attempting to end birthright citizenship for children born in the U.S. to non-citizen parents. This unconstitutional move was immediately met with lawsuits from civil rights groups, states, and legal scholars.

🔍 Consequences:

• Direct Constitutional Violation: The 14th Amendment explicitly states, "All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States."

• Judicial Pushback: Federal courts have repeatedly blocked this attempt to rewrite the Constitution through executive action.

• Escalation of Legal Battles: The Trump administration is expected to appeal these rulings, potentially taking the fight to the Supreme Court.

🚨 Why This Matters:
This isn’t just about birthright citizenship—it’s about whether a sitting president can override the Constitution through executive orders. Trump and Musk’s Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) are openly attacking the foundations of American democracy to reshape the country to fit their authoritarian agenda.

📌 Sources:

• AP News: 22 states sue to stop Trump’s order blocking birthright citizenship

• AP News: Fourth federal judge blocks Trump’s birthright citizenship order

• ACLU: Immigrants’ Rights Advocates Sue Trump Administration Over Birthright Citizenship Executive Order

DOGE v. Treasury Department

🔴 UPDATE: February 21, 2025

Federal Judge Grants Preliminary Injunction Blocking DOGE from Treasury Systems

In a major legal setback for Elon Musk’s Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), U.S. District Judge Jeannette Vargas has granted a preliminary injunction blocking DOGE from accessing the Treasury Department’s payment systems and financial data. This ruling follows a lawsuit filed by 19 Democratic state attorneys general, led by New York AG Letitia James, which argued that DOGE’s involvement compromises sensitive taxpayer information and lacks legal authority over federal financial infrastructure.

🚨 Key Developments:

• Access to Treasury Data Blocked – The ruling prevents DOGE from accessing critical payment systems while the lawsuit proceeds, citing concerns over unauthorized disclosures and potential politicization of financial records.

• Cybersecurity Training Mandated – The injunction will remain in effect until DOGE members complete Treasury-certified cybersecurity training, which must be verified by March 24, delaying Musk’s federal takeover plans.

• Legal Challenge Gains Momentum – This is part of several lawsuits challenging DOGE’s access to sensitive federal data. While rulings vary across jurisdictions, this injunction represents a major legal win against DOGE’s unchecked expansion.

🔍 Consequences:

• National Security Concerns Intensify – The lawsuit highlights growing fears that DOGE operatives could weaponize financial data for political gain, raising concerns over partisan manipulation of Social Security, Medicare, and IRS audits.

• Setback for Trump’s Administrative Overreach – The ruling signals judicial resistance to the administration’s efforts to bypass traditional checks and balances in consolidating power under Musk’s DOGE framework.

• Further Legal Battles Ahead – With ongoing litigation over DOGE’s access to IRS data, government payroll systems, and federal contract payments, this injunction may set a critical precedent limiting DOGE’s reach.

📌 Sources:

• Reuters: Judge extends block on Musk's DOGE from Treasury systems

• AP News: Judge upholds ban on DOGE accessing sensitive Treasury information, for now

• Politico: Treasury, White House agree to limits on DOGE’s access to IRS data

🔴 UPDATE: February 8, 2025

In a shocking reversal, Marko Elez—the 25-year-old software engineer who previously resigned from the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) after his racist and pro-eugenics social media posts surfaced—has been reinstated to his position overseeing Treasury systems.

Elon Musk announced the decision after conducting a poll on X (formerly Twitter), where nearly 78% of respondents supported Elez's return. Vice President JD Vance publicly endorsed the move, emphasizing the importance of "second chances" and dismissing concerns about Elez’s extremist views. President Trump echoed their sentiments, signaling full support from the administration.

But while the administration is eager to extend “second chances” to a fascist technocrat like Elez, they show no such leniency toward the FBI agents who investigated the January 6 insurrection. The very same officials preaching forgiveness are still relentlessly pursuing those who upheld the rule of law during one of the darkest days in American democracy. So much for second chances.

Despite Elez's lack of government experience—and his unauthorized modifications to Treasury’s Secure Payment Systems before his resignation—DOGE has placed him back in a position with access to sensitive federal financial infrastructure. This move comes just days after a federal judge ordered DOGE to destroy data collected from Treasury systems, raising fresh alarms about the administration’s reckless disregard for national security and ethical governance.

Critics warn that reinstating Elez not only undermines accountability but also signals a disturbing normalization of extremist views within the highest levels of government. “Giving Musk's goon squad access to systems controlling Social Security, Medicare, and other key federal programs is a national security nightmare,” said Senator Ron Wyden, a member of the Senate Intelligence Committee.

📌 Sources:

AP News: Musk says he will bring back DOGE staffer who resigned after a report of racist postings

The Verge: Musk promises to reinstate DOGE staffer linked to racist account

Vanity Fair: Elon Musk and JD Vance Agree On Rehiring DOGE Employee Who Wrote He Was “Racist Before It Was Cool”

🔴 UPDATE: February 8, 2025

In a decisive legal victory, U.S. District Judge Paul Engelmayer has temporarily blocked Elon Musk's Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) from accessing the U.S. Treasury’s sensitive payment systems. This comes after 19 Democratic-led states filed a lawsuit accusing the Trump administration of unlawfully granting DOGE access to critical federal financial infrastructure.

The restraining order mandates that any data obtained by DOGE since January 20 must be immediately destroyed, halting their ability to interfere with systems responsible for disbursing Social Security, Medicare, and other essential federal payments. A follow-up hearing is set for February 14, where the court will determine whether to extend the block.

New York Attorney General Letitia James, leading the coalition of states, declared, “No one is above the law, and we will not stand by while unqualified operatives jeopardize the financial stability and privacy of millions of Americans.”

This ruling strikes a critical blow to Musk’s overreach into federal systems and highlights the growing resistance against the Trump administration’s authoritarian tactics.

📌 Sources:

• Reuters: U.S. Judge Temporarily Blocks Musk's DOGE from Accessing Treasury Systems

• AP News: Judge Orders DOGE to Destroy Treasury Data, Sets Hearing for February 14

🔴 UPDATE: February 6, 2025
Marko Elez, a 25-year-old software engineer with no prior government experience, has resigned after his racist and pro-eugenics social media posts surfaced. Despite his lack of qualifications, Elez had been granted deep access to Treasury’s payment systems—raising serious alarms about DOGE’s reckless disregard for ethics, competence, and security.

Now, new reports reveal that Elez’s access wasn’t just extensive—it was dangerous. While the Treasury Department and DOGE officials claimed their access was strictly “read-only,” it turns out this was a blatant lie. Elez had “write” access and made unauthorized changes to critical financial systems like the Payment Automation Manager (PAM) and Secure Payment System (SPS)—the backbone of federal disbursements.

This direct manipulation of Treasury infrastructure has ignited fresh legal challenges and amplified fears that DOGE isn’t just overstepping its bounds but may already be tampering with the nation’s financial stability.

📌 Sources:

• Wired: The US Treasury Claimed DOGE Technologist Didn't Have 'Write Access'—But He Actually Did

• Business Insider: Federal Employee Unions Sue Treasury Over DOGE’s Illegal Access to Data

• Forbes: DOGE Treasury Agent Resigns After Racist Posts Resurface

📅 Date: January 31, 2025

📰 Action:
In a move that shattered long-standing financial safeguards, Elon Musk and his Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) gained unprecedented access to the U.S. Treasury’s payment systems, overseeing the flow of over $5 trillion annually—including Social Security, Medicare, and federal salaries.

This power grab began when David Lebryk, a senior Treasury official, resigned after refusing DOGE’s request for access to these critical systems. Within days, Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent caved to Musk's demands, granting DOGE operatives full entry into the infrastructure that handles the nation’s most vital disbursements.

While DOGE officials claimed their access was “read-only”, reports revealed that Musk’s team had modified system code with minimal oversight, raising alarms about potential manipulation of federal payments.

🔍 Consequences:

• Data Privacy at Risk: With DOGE operatives inside Treasury systems, the sensitive personal data of millions of Americans is now exposed to a billionaire-led agency with no public accountability.

• Potential Disruptions to Payments: Experts warn that DOGE could halt or redirect payments to critical programs like Social Security and Medicare—actions that, while likely unconstitutional, would cause immediate chaos and require legal intervention to reverse.

• Erosion of Institutional Integrity: The resignation of Treasury officials and DOGE’s unchecked influence signal a dangerous dismantling of democratic safeguards within the federal financial system.

🚨 Why This Matters:
This isn’t just a case of bureaucratic overreach—it’s a hostile takeover of America’s financial heartbeat. Allowing an unelected billionaire to gain control over federal payment systems is a direct assault on democratic governance. This is how authoritarian regimes consolidate power: by infiltrating and undermining the systems that keep governments accountable to the people.

If Musk can manipulate the flow of federal funds today, what’s stopping them from controlling who gets paid—or doesn’t—tomorrow? This is more than just a technical maneuver. It’s a power play designed to bypass Congress, destabilize public trust, and further centralize control in the hands of a few.

📌 Sources:

• MarketWatch: Elon Musk may have just staged a '21st-century coup' at the Treasury Department. What could happen next.

• Vox: Elon Musk's secretive government IT takeover, explained.

• The Guardian: It is Elon Musk who is now running the United States. Not Donald Trump.

DOGE v. DOJ

🔴 UPDATE: February 21, 2025

In a stunning rebuke to the Trump-aligned Justice Department, a federal judge has vacated the upcoming corruption trial for New York City Mayor Eric Adams—but has refused to dismiss the charges outright. Instead, U.S. District Judge Dale Ho has taken the extraordinary step of appointing former U.S. Solicitor General Paul Clement, a conservative legal heavyweight, to present arguments against the DOJ’s move to drop the case.

🚨 Key Developments:

• DOJ’s Attempt to Drop the Case Blocked – The Trump administration’s Justice Department abruptly moved to dismiss all charges against Adams, sparking outrage among federal prosecutors and leading to multiple resignations within the DOJ.

• Judge Keeps the Case Alive – While the trial date has been vacated, Judge Ho is refusing to let the DOJ’s interference kill the case, instead appointing Paul Clement to argue in favor of continuing the prosecution.

• Adams Still Facing Corruption Allegations – Adams is accused of accepting over $100,000 in illegal campaign contributions and gifts from Turkish nationals during his time as Brooklyn borough president—charges he has denied.

🔍 Consequences:

• Judicial Check on DOJ Interference – The DOJ’s move to drop the case was widely seen as politically motivated, and Judge Ho’s decision ensures that the case won’t be buried without scrutiny.

• Conservative Attorney Now Leading Prosecution Argument – Paul Clement’s appointment adds legitimacy to the argument that the DOJ’s dismissal request lacks legal merit, setting up a potential courtroom battle over prosecutorial independence.

• More Legal Turmoil Ahead – With Adams’ top deputies resigning and New York Governor Kathy Hochul considering increased state oversight, this case is far from over—and could turn into a landmark fight over DOJ corruption under Trump.

📌 Sources:

• AP News: Judge cancels trial for New York City Mayor Eric Adams but leaves corruption charges intact for now

• Reuters: Judge declines to immediately dismiss Eric Adams corruption case, delays trial

• Wall Street Journal: Judge Holds Off on Dismissing Case Against New York Mayor Eric Adams

🔴 UPDATE: February 18, 2025

In a major shake-up at the Justice Department, Denise Cheung, a senior federal prosecutor in Washington, D.C., has resigned after refusing to initiate a politically motivated investigation into a Biden-era government contract. According to reports, Interim U.S. Attorney Ed Martin—appointed under the Trump administration—ordered Cheung to convene a grand jury and freeze assets related to the contract, despite what she believed was a lack of legal justification.

🚨 Key Developments:

• Cheung Refused to Comply with a Legally Dubious Order – The Trump-aligned DOJ leadership attempted to pressure Cheung into opening an investigation with no clear legal basis. When she refused, she was given an ultimatum: comply or resign.

• Continued DOJ Purge – Cheung’s resignation is part of a larger pattern of career prosecutors being forced out, as Trump’s DOJ seeks to politicize investigations and target political adversaries.

• Chilling Effect on Prosecutorial Integrity – Legal experts warn that these tactics mirror authoritarian playbooks, where the justice system is transformed into a political weapon rather than an impartial enforcer of the law.

🔍 Consequences:

• DOJ’s Independence Further Erodes – The Justice Department is being stripped of career professionals unwilling to carry out politically driven prosecutions, leaving loyalists to enforce Trump’s agenda.

• Weaponization of Federal Law Enforcement – With Merrick Garland gone, and Pam Bondi now running the DOJ, Trump’s allies are actively purging anyone who resists turning the Justice Department into a tool of political retaliation.

• More Resignations Likely – This is only the latest sign that career prosecutors may continue to flee, further undermining the DOJ’s ability to function as an independent legal institution.

📌 Sources:

• AP News: Supervisor in DC federal prosecutors’ office told to resign after dispute over investigation

• CBS News: Top criminal prosecutor in U.S. Attorney's Office in D.C. resigns

• Politico: Senior prosecutor in Washington quits, citing pressure to probe Biden-era climate funds

• New York Post: Senior US prosecutor resigns, citing demand to probe Biden-era contract

🔴 UPDATE: February 14, 2025

The Department of Justice (DOJ) is in crisis as six senior officials have now resigned in protest following the Trump administration’s unprecedented order to drop the corruption case against New York City Mayor Eric Adams.

The resignations began after Acting Deputy Attorney General Emil Bove intervened, demanding that prosecutors dismiss the case. The most high-profile departure so far is Acting U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of New York (SDNY), Danielle Sassoon, who stepped down immediately after refusing to comply.

While some may see this as a victory for the rule of law—where principled attorneys refuse to follow corrupt orders—it is, in reality, a step toward the fascists’ endgame. Every resignation of an ethical prosecutor, career federal employee, or independent official leaves a void that will be swiftly filled with loyalists willing to do the regime’s bidding. The more principled individuals who step aside, the easier it becomes to weaponize the government against the public. This is not a triumph—it’s the intended outcome of authoritarianism.

📌 Sources:

• AP News: Order to drop New York Mayor Adams’ case roils Justice Department as high-ranking officials resign

📅 Date: February 12, 2025
📰 Action:

The Trump administration has forced the DOJ to drop its corruption case against New York City Mayor Eric Adams, despite mounting evidence of financial misconduct.

The case, led by SDNY’s Public Integrity Section, was investigating allegations of illegal campaign donations and financial dealings tied to Adams’ administration. Prosecutors had built what they described as a “clear and compelling” case, but Trump’s DOJ ordered them to immediately dismiss all charges.

🔍 Consequences:

• DOJ Independence Shattered: The forced dismissal of the Adams case sends a chilling message that political loyalty trumps the rule of law.

• Mass Prosecutor Resignations: Multiple career DOJ officials have already resigned in protest, including key figures in the Public Integrity Section.

• Public Trust in Law Enforcement Erodes: If the DOJ can be weaponized to protect political allies, what happens when federal prosecutors investigate Trump or his inner circle?

🚨 Why This Matters:

This is a direct attack on the rule of law. The DOJ’s Public Integrity Section exists to hold powerful figures accountable without political interference. By forcing prosecutors to drop a major corruption case, the Trump administration is openly dismantling the last barriers of accountability—and sending a message that loyalty, not justice, determines who faces consequences.

📌 Sources:

• Reuters: Trump DOJ's order to drop Eric Adams case sparks mass resignations

• The Wall Street Journal: Top U.S. Prosecutors Resign After Order to Drop Eric Adams Case

DOGE v. Legal Immigration

🔴 UPDATE: February 20, 2025

Trump Administration Terminates TPS for Haitians, 521,000 at Risk of Deportation

The Trump administration has continued its purge of legal immigration protections, officially terminating Temporary Protected Status (TPS) for Haitians, stripping 521,000 individuals of their legal right to remain in the U.S. The decision, announced by Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem, reverses a Biden-era extension that would have kept protections in place until 2026.

TPS for Haitians will now expire on August 3, 2025, meaning hundreds of thousands of individuals who have lawfully resided in the U.S. for years could face deportation—many to a country still racked with extreme violence, government collapse, and economic devastation.

🚨 Key Developments:

• 521,000 Haitians Lose TPS Protections – Haitian nationals previously shielded by TPS will now be subject to deportation starting in August 2025 unless Congress or the courts intervene.

• Biden-era Extensions Overturned – The previous administration had recognized Haiti’s extreme instability, granting an extension until February 2026, but Trump’s DHS abruptly revoked that decision.

• Legal and Humanitarian Crisis Incoming – Immigrant advocates warn that Haiti is currently experiencing one of its worst humanitarian disasters in decades, making mass deportations cruel, destabilizing, and inhumane.

🔍 Consequences:

• Thousands of Families Could Be Separated – Many TPS holders have lived in the U.S. for decades, raising children who are U.S. citizens, and now face forced removal from their families.

• Haitian Deportations Likely to Be Deadly – Haiti is currently facing an escalating gang crisis, kidnappings, and political anarchy—sending people back is a potential death sentence.

• DOGE Expands Its War on Legal Immigration – The termination of TPS for Haitians and Venezuelans within weeks of each other signals that no protected status is safe, with more terminations likely to follow.

📌 Sources:

• USCIS: Update on TPS for Haiti

• AP News: Trump administration throws out protections from deportation for roughly half a million Haitians

• Wall Street Journal: Trump Rolls Back Protections for Haitian Migrants

• Politico: Trump moves to end protections for 500K Haitian migrants — paving the way for deportations

📅 Date: February 3, 2025
📰 Action:

The Trump administration has officially terminated Temporary Protected Status (TPS) for Venezuelans, stripping protections from approximately 348,000 individuals who had been shielded from deportation under previous extensions by the Biden administration. The termination, announced by the Department of Homeland Security (DHS), means that TPS protections for Venezuelans will now expire in April 2025, leaving thousands at risk of removal and the loss of work authorization.

This move is part of a broader hardline shift against legal immigration pathways under Elon Musk’s Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), which has aggressively rolled back humanitarian protections and sought to reduce immigration at all levels, even for those already lawfully residing in the United States.

🚨 Key Developments:

• Venezuelan TPS Protections End April 2025 – 348,000 individuals who had been granted TPS due to the economic collapse, dictatorship, and humanitarian crisis in Venezuela will now be subject to deportation.

• Legal Challenges Already Filed – Immigrant advocacy groups and Venezuelan nationals have filed multiple lawsuits, arguing that the termination is illegal and politically motivated, violating constitutional protections and administrative law.

• Expanded Attacks on Legal Immigration – This move follows a pattern of escalating crackdowns, signaling that other TPS terminations, green card slowdowns, and refugee caps may be next under DOGE’s anti-immigration agenda.

🔍 Consequences:

• Mass Deportations Incoming? – Tens of thousands of Venezuelans could now face deportation, despite ongoing instability in Venezuela and previous U.S. recognition of the country’s humanitarian crisis.

• Work Authorization Revoked – Thousands of TPS holders who have built lives, jobs, and families in the U.S. will now lose their legal ability to work, creating economic hardship for entire communities.

• Chilling Effect on Immigration Protections – The administration’s willingness to gut protections for Venezuelans, whom Republicans previously championed as victims of socialism, shows that no immigrant group is safe from DOGE’s purge.

📌 Sources:

• NBC News: Venezuelans in U.S. call Trump's move to end deportation protections a 'betrayal'

• NPR: 'Beyond betrayal.' Venezuelans in Florida are angry at Trump immigration policy

• CBS News: Trump administration ends temporary immigration program for hundreds of thousands of Venezuelans

DOGE v. Federal Employees

🔴 UPDATE: February 20, 2025

A federal judge has ruled in favor of the Trump administration, allowing mass terminations of probationary federal employees to proceed—marking the largest federal workforce purge in modern history. U.S. District Judge Christopher Cooper denied an injunction sought by labor unions, effectively giving DOGE free rein to gut federal agencies under the guise of “efficiency.”

🚨 Key Developments:

• 6,700 IRS Workers Terminated – The IRS began firing employees on Thursday, targeting compliance divisions, sparking concerns that tax enforcement and auditing capabilities will be crippled.

• 50,000 Defense Department Jobs on the Chopping Block – The administration has announced plans to slash 50,000 positions from the Department of Defense (DoD), with terminations expected to begin as early as Friday.

• Judge Claims Hands Are Tied – In his ruling, Judge Cooper stated that the courts lack jurisdiction to block the firings, telling unions to seek relief through the Federal Labor Relations Authority (FLRA)—a bureaucratic dead end that buys the administration time to complete the purge.

🔍 Consequences:

• IRS Gutted Ahead of Tax Season – With thousands of compliance officers fired, tax audits, enforcement actions, and refund processing will be severely disrupted, potentially costing the U.S. government billions in lost revenue.

• Defense Readiness Compromised – The planned 50,000 layoffs at the Pentagon include civilian contractors, intelligence analysts, and logistics personnel, raising alarms about national security vulnerabilities and the hollowing out of military support infrastructure.

• Unions Dealt a Blow, But Fight Continues – Federal labor unions warn that more legal challenges are coming, arguing that the layoffs exceed presidential authority and violate union protections. However, with this ruling, Trump’s administration can continue mass firings unchecked—for now.

📌 Sources:

• Reuters: Trump can continue mass firings despite disruption and chaos, US judge rules

• AP News: IRS plans to lay off 7,000 probationary workers beginning Thursday, AP source says

• News Nation: Judge rules Trump administration can move ahead on mass government layoffs

🔴 UPDATE: February 18, 2025

In a major legal rebuke to the Trump administration’s effort to purge federal watchdogs, DC federal judge Rudolph Contreras has ordered the reinstatement of Cathy Harris as Chair of the Merit Systems Protection Board (MSPB). The ruling blocks Trump’s attempt to fire Harris, which was widely seen as part of his broader war on federal employees and civil service protections.

🚨 Key Developments:

• Judge Blocks Harris’ Removal – U.S. District Judge Rudolph Contreras ruled that Trump exceeded his authority in attempting to remove Harris, citing statutory protections that prevent arbitrary firings of MSPB members.

• MSPB’s Role in Federal Worker Protections – The MSPB adjudicates employment disputes, ensuring that federal employees are not fired due to political retaliation or wrongful termination. By attempting to oust Harris, Trump signaled his intent to dismantle the very agency protecting civil servants from political purges.

• Legal Battle Continues – Harris remains temporarily reinstated, but the case will move forward as the administration fights to overturn the ruling.

🔍 Consequences:

• Attempt to Gut Federal Worker Protections Fails—for Now – DOGE’s assault on career civil servants is facing legal pushback, setting a precedent that Trump’s authority to purge federal employees has limits.

• Judicial Pushback Against Federal Overreach – This ruling could impact future efforts by DOGE to dismantle independent agencies, strengthening the case for federal workforce protections.

• Sign of Broader Legal Battles Ahead – This is just the latest in a series of lawsuits challenging the administration’s attempts to dismantle civil service safeguards and replace experienced federal employees with loyalists.

📌 Sources:

• Reuters: US judge blocks Trump from removing Democrat from government workplace board

• The Hill: Federal judge reinstates employee appeals board member fired by Trump

• Bloomberg Law: Judge Reinstates Trump-Fired Worker Appeals Panel Member

United States District Court for the District of Columbia: Judge Rudolph Contreras' Memorandum on MSPB Chair Reinstatement

🔴 UPDATE: February 14, 2025

The Trump administration’s latest round of federal workforce purges has hit the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) hard, with hundreds of epidemiologists, disease surveillance experts, and emergency response staff abruptly terminated as part of the Department of Government Efficiency’s (DOGE) continued assault on public health agencies.

This reckless downsizing comes at a time when H5N1 bird flu outbreaks are being reported across multiple U.S. poultry farms, prompting heightened surveillance efforts by global health agencies. The World Health Organization (WHO) has confirmed a human case in Cambodia, though no sustained human-to-human transmission has been reported.

While experts stress that the current public health risk remains low, the mass firings at the CDC could severely hinder the U.S. response should the situation escalate. Public health infrastructure relies on continuous monitoring, rapid response teams, and cross-agency coordination—resources that are now being systematically dismantled.

🔍 Key Concerns:

• Weakened Outbreak Surveillance – The CDC’s ability to track and analyze new viral threats is now in question, as experienced epidemiologists and data analysts are shown the door.

• Disrupted Response Coordination – Mass layoffs in key CDC divisions may slow critical containment efforts if the outbreak spreads beyond poultry populations.

• Contradiction of DOGE’s Own Stated Goals – If DOGE were truly concerned about government "efficiency," it would not be gutting the agencies tasked with protecting public health and preventing economic fallout from an uncontrolled outbreak.

🚨 Why This Matters:
Firing the very experts who monitor, prepare for, and respond to public health crises is not efficiency—it is sabotage. The administration is gambling with national preparedness, crippling the country’s ability to respond should the bird flu situation worsen. Even in the best-case scenario, these mass terminations leave long-term gaps in public health expertise that will take years to rebuild.

📌 Sources:

• Reuters: US CDC lays off probationary workers under Trump job cuts, source says

• AP News: HHS to lose thousands of workers under Trump administration probationary job cuts

• The Hill: Senate Democrat rips 'indefensible, indiscriminate' firings at CDC

• Politico: Mass layoffs, court challenges and buyouts: Making sense of Trump’s plans to shrink the federal workforce

🔴 UPDATE: February 13, 2025

The Trump administration, through Elon Musk’s Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), has escalated its assault on the federal workforce, launching a mass purge of government employees across multiple agencies. Thousands of federal workers have been terminated, marking one of the most aggressive downsizing efforts in U.S. history.

The cuts disproportionately target probationary employees—those still within their one- to two-year probationary period—allowing for mass dismissals without cause. These layoffs come just weeks after the administration’s controversial “Fork in the Road” buyout program, which aimed to entice 75,000 federal employees into voluntary resignation.

Agencies Hit by Mass Layoffs

• Department of Education: Sweeping terminations of staff from civil rights, federal student aid, and legal departments.

• Small Business Administration (SBA): 720 employees dismissed, slashing nearly 20% of its workforce.

• Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB): Staff reductions crippling enforcement efforts.

• General Services Administration (GSA): Gutted of key personnel managing federal properties and operations.

• Department of Veterans Affairs (VA): Over 1,000 employees terminated, jeopardizing services for veterans.

• Department of Energy: Plans to eliminate nearly 2,000 jobs.

• Office of Personnel Management (OPM): Firing of human resources and policy staff, further crippling federal hiring processes.

🚨 Why This Matters

These cuts are not just about reducing government spending—they are a deliberate attack on the federal workforce, designed to hollow out government agencies, weaken enforcement, and replace career professionals with unqualified loyalists.

While the administration sells this as "efficiency," the reality is a manufactured crisis: a government so dysfunctional that Americans begin to question its very existence—laying the groundwork for further dismantling.

This is not about fixing government—it’s about breaking it.

📌 Sources:

• The Guardian: Trump and Musk launch mass layoffs at several US federal agencies

• Reuters: Thousands fired in US government as Trump, Musk purge federal workers

• AP News: Trump administration begins sweeping layoffs with probationary workers, warns of larger cuts to come

• Politico: Trump administration fires thousands of federal workers

🔴 UPDATE: February 12, 2025

In a major victory for the Trump administration’s purge of the federal workforce, U.S. District Judge George A. O'Toole Jr. has lifted the temporary restraining order that previously blocked DOGE from proceeding with its deferred resignation program. The ruling allows the administration to move forward with its plan to shrink the federal workforce by thousands under the pretense of voluntary buyouts.

Despite legal challenges from federal employee unions, which argued the initiative was both illegal and lacked congressional authorization, O'Toole determined the unions lacked standing to challenge the program. As a result, the resignation offer remains valid, and all prior applicants will now be processed for departure.

🔍 Key Developments:

• Program Resumes: The deferred resignation scheme, which incentivizes federal employees to leave with eight months of pay and benefits, is back in effect. Over 65,000 employees have already accepted the offer.

• Final Deadline Passed: The Office of Personnel Management (OPM) has closed the program to new applicants as of 7:20 p.m. EST on February 12, 2025—meaning federal employees who didn’t apply in time are now locked into whatever working conditions DOGE imposes next.

• Escalating Fallout: Federal agencies are now scrambling to compensate for massive staffing losses while watchdogs warn of an impending crisis in institutional expertise.

🚨 Why This Matters:
This ruling greenlights the systematic gutting of the federal workforce, allowing the Trump administration to hollow out agencies, replace career professionals with loyalists, and accelerate the dismantling of government institutions. With no further legal obstacles, the exodus of skilled personnel will cripple agencies that provide vital public services.

📌 Sources:

• Reuters: US judge allows Trump to proceed with government employee buyout

• Federal News Network: Judge lifts restraining order blocking deferred resignation program

• Politico: Judge allows Trump to implement "Fork in the Road" deadline for federal workers

• AP News: Judge removes key legal hurdle for Trump’s plan to trim federal workforce with deferred resignations

• Wall Street Journal: Judge lifts freeze on Trump’s buyout plan for federal workers

🔴 UPDATE: February 7, 2025

Meet Edward Coristine: a 19-year-old hacker with a history of leaking secrets, now handed the keys to our government’s most sensitive systems by Elon Musk’s Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE). This isn’t a joke—it’s a national security disaster in the making.

Coristine, who proudly goes by the online handle “Big Balls,” was fired from Path Network in 2022 for spilling company secrets to competitors. But instead of being blacklisted from sensitive work, Musk rewarded him with access to federal systems that control Social Security, Medicare, and more. Yes, the same kid who bragged on Discord about having the power to wipe servers is now part of the team poking around in the heart of our government.

Let that sink in. A teenager with a history of betraying trust is now part of an unvetted group criss-crossing federal agencies, gathering data on government personnel, and tinkering with systems that millions of Americans rely on to survive. This isn’t just reckless—it’s a direct attack on the integrity and security of our government.

Lawmakers are sounding the alarm. Senator Ron Wyden called it a “national security nightmare,” and former FBI agents have said outright they’d have never approved someone like Coristine for this kind of role. And yet, here we are. Musk dismisses these concerns as “doxxing,” like this is some kind of tech forum squabble instead of a full-blown assault on our country’s stability.

DOGE claims to be about efficiency. But what’s efficient about putting our government in the hands of inexperienced, unethical tech bros who think national security is just another sandbox to play in?

This isn’t just incompetence—it’s sabotage. And if we don’t speak up now, the damage will be irreversible.

📌 Sources:

• Bloomberg: Musk’s DOGE Teen Was Fired By Cybersecurity Firm for Leaking Company Secrets

• Wired: The Young, Inexperienced Engineers Aiding Elon Musk’s Government Takeover

• Newsweek: Who is 'Big Balls'? Teen DOGE Engineer Edward Coristine

📅 Date: February 6, 2025
📰 Action:

In a massive effort to gut the federal workforce, Elon Musk’s Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) rolled out a controversial “deferred resignation” program, offering federal employees eight months' pay and benefits if they resigned by February 6, 2025. The program, ominously titled “Fork in the Road,” was pitched as a cost-cutting measure—but its real purpose was clear: force out experienced public servants to make room for unqualified loyalists.

The buyout offer was sent to hundreds of thousands of federal employees across various agencies, with the administration aiming to reduce the workforce by 5% to 10%—equating to up to 200,000 employees. Despite the legal and ethical concerns, over 60,000 employees accepted the offer before the deadline.

🔍 Consequences:

• Loss of Institutional Knowledge: This mass exodus threatens to cripple government functionality, as decades of expertise are wiped out in a single stroke.

• Political Weaponization of the Bureaucracy: The purge clears the way for Trump-Endorsed Incompetence (TEI) to fill critical positions, replacing seasoned professionals with unqualified loyalists.

• Legal Chaos: Federal employee unions, including the American Federation of Government Employees and the National Federation of Federal Employees, filed lawsuits arguing that the program was illegal without congressional approval. A federal judge has temporarily blocked the deadline, but the damage is already underway.

🚨 Why This Matters:
This isn’t just about cutting costs—it’s about weaponizing the federal workforce. By purging career public servants, the administration is undermining the integrity of government institutions, replacing expertise with blind loyalty. This is a hallmark of authoritarian regimes: dismantle the system from within, then rebuild it in the image of the ruling power.

The “Fork in the Road” isn’t just a buyout—it’s a political purge, designed to create a hollow government that serves only the interests of the powerful.

📌 Sources:

• The Wall Street Journal: Judge Pauses Deadline for Federal Worker Buyout Offer

• Reuters: US judge blocks Trump buyout program as 60,000 sign up to quit

DOGE v. Objective Reality

📅 Date: February 19, 2025
📰 Action:

In his latest deranged revision of history, Donald Trump falsely claimed that Ukraine started the war with Russia, parroting Kremlin propaganda like a fully compromised asset. Speaking at a closed-door donor event, Trump outright blamed Ukraine for Russia’s unprovoked invasion, conveniently ignoring every documented fact about the war, the thousands of Ukrainian civilians slaughtered, and the war crimes committed by Vladimir Putin’s forces.

Let’s be clear: this is not a claim that Trump is willingly cooperating with Putin. However, whether Trump is a knowing asset of the Kremlin or simply a useful fool is irrelevant—if he’s pushing Putin’s propaganda of his own free will, that may very well make it worse.

🚨 Key Developments:

• Trump Pushes Pro-Putin Lies – Despite clear, indisputable evidence that Russia invaded Ukraine on February 24, 2022, Trump flipped the script, blaming Ukraine for defending itself against an internationally recognized act of aggression.

• Zelenskyy Fires Back – Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy publicly blasted Trump’s revisionist garbage, stating that Trump is “living in a Russian disinformation bubble” and directly aiding Putin’s imperial ambitions.

• Echoing Russian State Media – The exact language used by Trump has already been amplified by Russia Today, TASS, and other Kremlin-controlled propaganda outlets, who couldn’t have scripted it better themselves.

🔍 Consequences:

• Trump Sides with America’s Enemies—Again – This is not confusion or misspeaking—this is intentional gaslighting designed to whitewash Putin’s crimes and undermine Ukraine’s fight for survival.

• Republicans Keep Letting It Slide – Once upon a time, the GOP pretended to stand against dictators. Now? Silence. Not a single prominent Republican has publicly condemned Trump for regurgitating Putin’s talking points.

• DOGE’s Disinformation Machine Goes into Overdrive – Expect Musk, Bannon, and the rest of the far-right ecosystem to spread this outrageous lie, reframing Russia’s brutal invasion as “Ukraine’s fault” in a full-scale revisionist propaganda push.

📌 Sources:

• The Guardian: Trump blames Ukraine over war with Russia, saying it could have made a deal

• Reuters: Zelenskiy demands 'more truth' after Trump accuses Ukraine of starting war

• Associated Press: A deeper look at the talks between US and Russian officials as Trump suggests Ukraine is to blame

DOGE v. NASA

📅 Date: February 18, 2025
📰 Action:

The Trump administration, through Elon Musk’s Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), has initiated mass layoffs at NASA, cutting 1,000 probationary employees and forcing an additional 750 staff members to resign under the controversial “Fork in the Road” buyout program. The cuts represent a 10% reduction in NASA’s workforce, dealing a severe blow to ongoing space missions, including the 2027 human moon landing.

Critics argue that the firings are politically motivated, designed to consolidate control over NASA’s projects and align the agency’s future with Musk’s private space ventures. The move has sparked fierce backlash from scientists, engineers, and aerospace experts who warn that these actions jeopardize U.S. leadership in space exploration.

🚨 Key Developments:

• Mass Layoffs Target NASA Engineers and Scientists – The firings disproportionately impact critical research and mission teams, including those at Johnson Space Center in Houston.

• NASA’s Workforce Shrinks by 10% – With 1,750 employees gone, the remaining staff face increased pressure to meet ambitious project deadlines, including Artemis missions.

• Industry Experts Sound Alarm – The Planetary Society and the American Federation of Government Employees have condemned the layoffs as reckless and politically driven, warning that the cuts could cripple America’s ability to compete in global space exploration.

🔍 Consequences:

• Threat to Moon and Mars Missions – The Artemis program, designed to land humans on the Moon by 2027, is now at risk of delays or even cancellation due to staffing shortages.

• Privatization of Space Exploration? – With Musk’s SpaceX dominating U.S. spaceflight, critics worry these cuts pave the way for further privatization, shifting NASA’s role from pioneering research to a supporting contractor for Musk’s ambitions.

• Weakened U.S. Space Leadership – As China and other nations ramp up their lunar and Martian exploration programs, NASA’s setbacks could cede space dominance to global competitors.

📌 Sources:

• Chron: NASA layoffs will take 10 percent of its workforce: Report

• Houston Chronicle: NASA is expected to lay off its probationary employees this week

• Planetary Society: The Planetary Society Strongly Opposes Mass Layoffs of Probationary Employees at NASA

DOGE v. FDA

📅 Date: February 18, 2025
📰 Action:

The Trump administration has purged dozens of FDA employees, continuing its pattern of gutting federal agencies under the guise of “efficiency.” Among the 89 terminations were staff from the Human Foods Program, medical device review teams, and food safety divisions, leading to immediate concerns about the agency’s ability to safeguard public health.

The firings appear to target regulatory oversight, with 20 of the dismissed employees directly involved in reviewing Elon Musk’s Neuralink brain implant applications. The cuts have sparked outrage within the FDA, culminating in the resignation of Jim Jones, the head of the FDA’s food division, who called the layoffs "indiscriminate" and a threat to food safety standards.

🚨 Key Developments:

• FDA’s Food Safety Oversight Undermined – Jim Jones, head of the FDA's Human Foods Program, resigned, stating that the mass layoffs cripple the agency’s ability to implement vital food safety measures.

• Neuralink Review Team Fired – 20 FDA employees responsible for evaluating Elon Musk’s Neuralink brain implant applications were among those dismissed, raising concerns about regulatory capture.

• Part of a Broader Purge – The FDA terminations are part of mass firings across multiple health agencies, including 3,600 probationary employees at the CDC and NIH, crippling public health programs.

🔍 Consequences:

• Food Safety Jeopardized – With the head of FDA’s Human Foods Program gone and dozens of staff terminated, enforcement against foodborne illness outbreaks and industry violations could be severely weakened.

• Medical Oversight at Risk – The elimination of Neuralink review staff raises concerns that Musk’s brain implant company may now face less regulatory scrutiny, increasing risks to patient safety.

• Further Public Health Agency Erosion – The mass firings at the FDA, CDC, and NIH signal an aggressive move to dismantle federal oversight of critical health regulations.

📌 Sources:

• Reuters: Exclusive: FDA staff reviewing Musk’s Neuralink were included in DOGE employee firings, sources say

• AP News: Trump administration cuts reach FDA employees in food safety, medical devices and tobacco products

• Politico: Mass firings continue across nation's health agencies

DOGE v. FAA

🔴 UPDATE: February 17, 2025

Mass Firings at FAA as DOGE Eyes Air Traffic Control Overhaul

The Trump administration has escalated its purge of federal agencies, this time targeting the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA). In a move that has sparked outrage from aviation safety experts and unions, hundreds of probationary FAA employees, including air traffic controllers, were abruptly fired—just weeks after a fatal mid-air collision near Washington, D.C., killed 67 people.

At the same time, Elon Musk’s Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) is now actively working with the FAA to “modernize” air traffic control operations, fueling concerns that privatization and deregulation could be on the horizon.

🚨 Key Developments:

• Mass Firings Without Cause – Hundreds of FAA employees were terminated via late-night emails from a non-governmental address, raising questions about due process and transparency. The Professional Aviation Safety Specialists (PASS) union condemned the move, calling it a reckless attack on aviation safety.

• DOGE Infiltration of Air Traffic Control – DOGE officials, including engineers from SpaceX, have been scheduled to visit the FAA’s Air Traffic Control Command Center in Virginia to evaluate its operations. Transportation Secretary Sean Duffy has framed this as an effort to modernize the system, but critics warn it could be a step toward privatizing or outsourcing air traffic control functions.

• Air Travel Safety at Risk – The FAA was already facing a severe staffing shortage, with an estimated 3,500 open air traffic controller positions. These mass terminations could cripple an already strained workforce, increasing delays and potential safety hazards.

🔍 Consequences:

• Threat to Aviation Safety – Reducing the number of trained air traffic controllers amid growing concerns about air travel safety could lead to further delays, near misses, and even more fatal incidents.

• Push Toward Privatization? – DOGE’s involvement in FAA operations suggests that the administration may be seeking to shift air traffic control functions to the private sector, raising alarms about accountability and oversight.

• Legal Challenges Expected – Unions and industry watchdogs are preparing to challenge the terminations, arguing that they were politically motivated and endanger public safety.

📌 Sources:

• AP News: Trump begins firings of FAA air traffic control staff just weeks after fatal DC plane crash

• Business Insider: Hundreds of FAA workers were fired weeks after deadly DC crash, union says, as Trump promises aviation safety upgrades

• Reuters: Musk's DOGE team to visit US FAA command center on Monday

📅 Date: January 29, 2025
📰 Action:

In a series of catastrophic decisions, Elon Musk unleashed Trump-Endorsed Incompetence (TEI) on the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA)—and the results were as deadly as they were predictable. Musk’s power trip gutted the agency’s leadership, shredded safety oversight, and left American airspace in chaos, culminating in the first fatal mid-air collision in 16 years.

Here’s how it unfolded:

• Forcing the Resignation of FAA Administrator Mike Whitaker
  After Whitaker fined SpaceX for regulatory violations, Musk publicly demanded his resignation. Whitaker stepped down on January 20, 2025, leaving the FAA without an experienced leader in one of the busiest aviation periods of the year.

• Hiring Freezes and Buyout Offers to FAA Employees
  A day later, Musk imposed a hiring freeze across the FAA and offered buyouts to employees, including air traffic controllers. Though controllers were later exempted, the damage was done—staffing shortages worsened, and chaos reigned.

• Dismantling the Aviation Safety Advisory Committee
  By January 22, Musk had disbanded the FAA’s Aviation Safety Advisory Committee, effectively stripping away critical safety oversight and decades of institutional knowledge. Just a week later, the inevitable happened: on January 29, 2025, an American Airlines flight collided with a U.S. Army Black Hawk helicopter over the Potomac River near Reagan National Airport, killing all 67 people on board both aircraft. Investigators point to glaring failures in air traffic coordination and safety oversight—failures that began the moment Musk’s TEI took over.

🔍 Consequences:

• Leadership Vacuum: Whitaker’s resignation left the FAA adrift, with no qualified leadership to manage an already strained aviation system.

• Staffing Crisis: The hiring freeze and buyouts gutted the FAA’s workforce, compounding existing shortages and leaving critical positions unfilled.

• Safety Oversight Shredded: Disbanding the Aviation Safety Advisory Committee stripped away essential safeguards, creating blind spots in safety protocols.

• A Preventable Disaster: The tragic collision at Reagan National Airport wasn’t an accident—it was the direct result of TEI and Musk’s reckless disregard for aviation safety.

🚨 Why This Matters:
This wasn’t just mismanagement. It was a deliberate attack on the expertise and systems that keep Americans safe. When unelected billionaires like Musk are handed the reins to public agencies, they bring their arrogance, their recklessness, and their contempt for regulation with them.

This is how fascism operates—not by abolishing institutions outright, but by hollowing them out until they’re too broken to function. Musk’s interference at the FAA led to a preventable tragedy, and it’s a chilling preview of what happens when Trump-Endorsed Incompetence becomes the standard across government.

📌 Sources:

· Reuters: FAA chief Whitaker to step down in January when Trump takes office

· Associated Press: Air traffic controllers were initially offered buyouts and told to consider leaving government

· Reuters: US official vows to 'fix' FAA after fatal collision

DOGE v. IRS

📅 Date: February 17, 2025
📰 Action:

Elon Musk’s Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) is now setting its sights on the Internal Revenue Service (IRS), raising alarm over potential access to sensitive taxpayer data. According to multiple reports, DOGE staffers have been seen at IRS headquarters, allegedly reviewing agency operations under the pretext of "efficiency reforms."

One of the key figures leading this effort is Gavin Kliger, a former Silicon Valley engineer who previously worked at Databricks and Twitter. Kliger has positioned himself as a crusader against "institutional failure" and "government corruption," though his online activity has revealed a troubling history of amplifying white supremacist and misogynistic figures.

🚨 Key Developments:

• IRS Considering DOGE Access to Taxpayer Data – Reports indicate that the IRS is reviewing a request that would allow DOGE personnel to access classified taxpayer systems, potentially exposing millions of Americans’ financial records to Musk’s handpicked operatives.

• Political and Legal Concerns Mount – The move has triggered bipartisan concern over privacy violations, potential weaponization of tax audits, and conflicts of interest—particularly given Musk’s own tax disputes with the IRS.

• House Judiciary Committee Investigating AI Surveillance – Eleven months prior, the House Judiciary Committee opened an inquiry into the IRS’s use of AI for financial monitoring, citing concerns that the agency was conducting unauthorized surveillance of U.S. citizens. Now, with DOGE attempting to embed itself within the IRS, watchdog groups warn this could set the stage for widespread abuse.

🔍 Consequences:

• Threat to Taxpayer Privacy – If DOGE operatives gain access to IRS data, it could expose private financial records to political appointees with no oversight.

• Weaponization of the IRS – Critics warn that Trump-aligned officials could use the agency to target political opponents, leak private financial information, or shield allies from tax scrutiny.

• Legal Challenges Expected – Several civil rights and privacy groups are reportedly preparing to challenge any IRS decision granting DOGE access, arguing it violates data protection laws and due process safeguards.

📌 Sources:

• The Guardian: IRS reportedly preparing to give Musk's DOGE agency access to taxpayer data

• Business Insider: A former Silicon Valley engineer wrote on Substack about why he left behind 'staggering' stock grants to work for DOGE

• Wall Street Journal: DOGE Staffer Arrives at Internal Revenue Service Headquarters

DOGE v. LGBTQ+

🔴 UPDATE: February 16, 2025

Federal Judge Declares Trump’s Executive Order Unconstitutional on Multiple Grounds

In a major legal defeat for the Trump administration, U.S. District Judge Lauren King (Washington State) has ruled that Executive Order 14187 is unconstitutional on multiple grounds, including violating Congress’ power of the purse. The ruling expands upon her February 14 injunction, which temporarily blocked the order, by explicitly stating that the executive action exceeds presidential authority and violates fundamental constitutional principles.

🚨 Key Ruling Highlights:

• Multiple Constitutional Violations – The judge determined that the executive order is "unconstitutional in multiple ways", specifically citing that it unlawfully usurps Congress’ spending power by attempting to defund hospitals that provide gender-affirming care.

• Strengthening the Injunction – This decision bolsters the temporary restraining order and increases the likelihood that the order will be permanently struck down in future legal proceedings.

• Judicial Rejection of Trump’s Overreach – King’s opinion underscores that the executive branch cannot unilaterally control federal funding without congressional approval, dealing a serious blow to the administration’s legal strategy.

📌 Sources:

• Washington District Court: Judge Lauren King’s Opinion on Executive Order 14187

• Raw Story: ‘Perverse situation’: Judge finds Trump action to be ‘unconstitutional in multiple ways’

📅 Date: February 14, 2025
📰 Action:

In yet another authoritarian assault on civil rights, the Trump administration issued Executive Order 14187 on January 28, 2025, banning all forms of gender-affirming medical care for minors. The order prohibits puberty blockers, hormone therapy, and surgical interventions for individuals under 18 and directs federal agencies to withhold funding from any medical institution providing such care.

Framing the order as a measure to "protect children from irreversible harm," the administration dismissed overwhelming medical consensus that gender-affirming care reduces suicide risk and is considered best practice by leading medical organizations, including the American Academy of Pediatrics, the American Medical Association, and the Endocrine Society.

The executive order faced immediate legal challenges from the ACLU, Lambda Legal, PFLAG, and GLMA, as well as multiple Democratic-led states. Lawsuits argue that the order is unconstitutional, violates state authority over healthcare, and discriminates based on sex.

🔍 Key Developments:

• February 13, 2025 – U.S. District Judge Brendan Hurson (Maryland) issued a temporary restraining order, blocking the executive order for two weeks while the case is litigated. The judge cited "extreme risk" to transgender youth whose medical care could be abruptly cut off.

• February 14, 2025 – U.S. District Judge Lauren King (Washington State) granted a preliminary injunction in a separate lawsuit filed by the attorneys general of Washington, Oregon, and Minnesota. The ruling temporarily blocks enforcement of the executive order in those states, arguing that it infringes upon state sovereignty and unlawfully targets transgender individuals.

🔍 Consequences:

• Temporary Relief for Trans Youth – The court rulings have temporarily blocked enforcement, allowing medical providers to continue offering gender-affirming care while legal battles continue.

• Federal Overreach Challenged – The lawsuits argue that the executive order exceeds presidential authority and improperly interferes with state-regulated healthcare.

• Legal Battle Ahead – These are temporary injunctions, not final rulings. The administration is expected to appeal, and the issue could escalate to the Supreme Court.

🚨 Why This Matters:

This is not just about transgender healthcare—it’s a direct test of federal authoritarianism. The administration is attempting to override state control of medical regulations and ignore medical science in favor of ideological extremism. This executive order is part of a broader strategy to erase LGBTQ+ rights, using government power to enforce religious and political agendas at the expense of civil liberties.

📌 Sources:

• Wall Street Journal: Judge Blocks Trump Order Restricting Medical Treatments for Transgender Children and Teens

• Politico: Democratic AGs win second court ruling against Trump's order on gender-affirming care

• AP News: Federal judge pauses President Trump's order restricting gender-affirming care for trans youth

DOGE v. OSC

🔴 UPDATE: February 17, 2025

Trump Takes OSC Battle to Supreme Court, Seeking to Fire Whistleblower Watchdog

The Trump administration has escalated its war on oversight, petitioning the U.S. Supreme Court to overturn a lower court's ruling that reinstated Hampton Dellinger as head of the Office of Special Counsel (OSC). Dellinger, appointed by President Biden in 2024 to serve a five-year term, was removed earlier this month in a blatant move to eliminate independent oversight of federal whistleblower protections.

A federal judge previously blocked Trump's attempt to fire Dellinger, ruling that OSC leadership can only be removed for cause—such as inefficiency, neglect of duty, or malfeasance. The administration, however, is now arguing that this statutory protection infringes on the president’s executive authority, framing the dispute as a constitutional power struggle.

🚨 What’s at Stake?

• Whistleblower Protections Under Attack: The OSC is responsible for safeguarding federal employees who report corruption, waste, and abuse. With Dellinger gone, these protections would be significantly weakened.
• The Erosion of Independent Oversight: If SCOTUS sides with Trump, it could pave the way for the president to fire independent watchdogs at will, further centralizing power.
• A Dangerous Precedent: Legal experts warn that this move is part of a broader effort to dismantle checks and balances, turning agencies meant to hold government accountable into rubber stamps for the executive branch.

This case will test whether the Supreme Court is willing to back Trump’s expansive claims of executive power. If successful, this ruling could have dire consequences for government accountability, making it easier to purge oversight officials who refuse to serve as loyalists.

📌 Sources:

• Politico: Fight over Trump's firing of watchdog reaches Supreme Court

• Reuters: Trump administration turns to US Supreme Court in bid to fire agency head

• AP News: Trump administration wants the Supreme Court to let the firing of whistleblower agency head proceed

📅 Date: February 13, 2025
📰 Action:
In a significant legal setback for the Trump administration, U.S. District Judge Amy Berman Jackson has temporarily reinstated Hampton Dellinger as the head of the Office of Special Counsel (OSC) after his abrupt dismissal by President Donald Trump. The ruling blocks the administration’s attempt to replace Dellinger with Veterans Affairs Secretary Doug Collins while the court reviews the legality of his removal.

The OSC is a key watchdog agency responsible for protecting whistleblowers and enforcing federal Hatch Act violations, which prevent government employees from engaging in partisan political activity. Dellinger, appointed by President Joe Biden for a five-year term, was removed without cause, prompting immediate legal challenges. Federal law states that the Special Counsel can only be removed for specific reasons, such as inefficiency, neglect of duty, or malfeasance.

🔍 Consequences:

• Judicial Blow to Trump’s Overreach: The court's ruling is a major check on Trump's efforts to purge independent oversight agencies and consolidate power within the executive branch.

• OSC’s Critical Role in Government Oversight: The OSC investigates whistleblower complaints and ethics violations within the federal government. Undermining the agency would weaken critical safeguards against corruption.

• Ongoing Legal Battle: The judge’s ruling is temporary, with further hearings expected in the coming weeks. If the case proceeds, it could establish a precedent protecting independent agency heads from politically motivated firings.

🚨 Why This Matters:
This is yet another power grab by the Trump administration aimed at dismantling the guardrails of democracy. The Office of Special Counsel exists to keep the government accountable—something that DOGE and its allies clearly see as an obstacle. By firing Dellinger and attempting to install a loyalist, Trump is sending a clear message: whistleblowers and watchdogs are not welcome.

📌 Sources:

• Reuters: Judge Keeps US Watchdog Official Targeted by Trump in Job—for Now

• Politico: Judge to Trump-terminated ethics watchdog: You’re un-fired

• AP News: With firings and lax enforcement, Trump moving to dismantle government’s public integrity guardrails

DOGE v. USAID

🔴 UPDATE: February 14, 2025

The Trump administration has fired USAID Inspector General Paul Funk III on February 12^th after he warned that dismantling the agency would result in the loss of over $8 billion in unspent humanitarian aid. His termination comes amid mounting concerns that critical medical supplies, food shipments, and life-saving medications are being left to expire or go to waste due to the administration’s reckless approach to foreign aid.

Funk’s final report before his removal outlined the devastating impact of USAID’s abrupt shutdown:

• Billions in humanitarian funds are set to expire, with no legal framework in place to reallocate them.

• Medical oxygen tanks and critical HIV/TB medications are currently stranded in shipping containers and warehouses, unable to reach clinics in need.

• Food aid shipments of wheat and soy—already purchased—are sitting idle, despite a waiver meant to exempt food assistance from the freeze.

• USAID-supported HIV/AIDS clinics in Zimbabwe have been forced to close, leaving patients without life-saving treatments.

The administration has justified Funk’s firing as part of its broader effort to “streamline” government oversight, but insiders report that his removal was a direct response to his warnings about the catastrophic consequences of USAID’s dismantling.

🚨 Why This Matters:

Funk’s firing is not just about punishing a watchdog—it’s about silencing the truth. The Trump administration is actively covering up the full scale of harm caused by its dismantling of USAID. This is a calculated destruction of U.S. humanitarian leadership, one that leaves suffering populations to fend for themselves while billions in taxpayer-funded aid go to waste.

📌 Sources:

• Reuters: Trump's dismantling of USAID strands oxygen, HIV drugs in transit, contractors say

• The Guardian: ‘Disruptive, unfair and cruel’: jobs lost and treatment stopped as USAid freeze hits HIV care in Zimbabwe

• Reuters: Exclusive: US food purchases for foreign aid halted despite waiver

🔴 UPDATE: February 7, 2025

In a major blow to Trump’s administration and Elon Musk’s Department of Government Extinction (DOGE), U.S. District Judge Carl Nichols has issued a temporary restraining order (TRO) halting the administration’s aggressive move to sideline over 2,200 USAID employees. This ruling comes in response to lawsuits filed by the American Federation of Government Employees and the American Foreign Service Association, both arguing that the Trump administration has no legal authority to dismantle USAID without explicit congressional approval.

The administration had planned to gut USAID by placing the majority of its workforce on administrative leave, leaving only 611 essential personnel out of more than 10,000 employees worldwide. This mass sidelining would have crippled humanitarian aid, disaster relief, and development efforts across the globe, while also compromising U.S. national security interests.

Judge Nichols’ intervention not only halts the immediate damage but could lead to the reinstatement of 500 employees who had already been placed on leave. This legal victory underscores the importance of judicial checks against a regime that is hell-bent on undermining democratic institutions.

📌 Sources:

• AP News: Judge says he will temporarily block Trump from placing 2,200 USAID workers on paid leave

• Business Insider: Trump and Musk’s USAID shutdown blocked by federal court

📅 Date: February 3, 2025

📰 Action:
In his latest move, Elon Musk has dismantled USAID, the U.S. Agency for International Development. Overnight, USAID employees were locked out of their systems and instructed to work remotely, while Secretary of State Marco Rubio was installed as the “acting administrator,” with plans to fold the agency into the State Department.

Musk, whose public rants often target government institutions, called USAID a "criminal organization" and claimed it was "beyond repair." This, from a man who has built his empire on government contracts, yet now seeks to gut the very institutions that helped fuel his success.

🔍 Consequences:

• Millions at risk worldwide: USAID provides humanitarian aid, disaster relief, and development assistance across the globe. Shuttering the agency will cut off vital support to some of the world’s most vulnerable populations.

• Diplomatic fallout: This decision signals that the U.S. is stepping back from its role as a global leader in humanitarian efforts, leaving a void that will weaken international alliances and partnerships.

• Legality in question: Only Congress has the authority to dismantle a federal agency, but Musk and Trump’s administration are pressing forward without congressional approval. Legal experts have called this an overreach of executive power.

• Public backlash: Protests have erupted nationwide, with citizens outraged over the sudden closure of an agency critical to both U.S. diplomacy and global stability.

🚨 Why This Matters:
This isn’t just about cutting foreign aid—it’s about consolidating power and dismantling the institutions that uphold democracy. When unelected billionaires like Musk are given the authority to shut down government agencies without oversight, it’s not just mismanagement—it’s authoritarianism.

This is how fascism takes hold: by eroding democratic checks and balances, stripping away institutions that promote global cooperation and humanitarian values, and centralizing power in the hands of a few. Today it’s USAID. Tomorrow, it’s any agency that stands in their way. The slow dismantling of government isn’t a side effect—it’s the plan.

📌 Sources:

• Reuters: Musk and Trump’s Move to Kill USAID Sparks Outrage

• Associated Press: Protests Erupt Over USAID Shutdown

• Business Insider: Legal Experts Call USAID Shutdown "Flatly Illegal"

DOGE v. FEMA

📅 Date: February 12, 2025
📰 Action:

In yet another move to weaponize misinformation, the Trump administration is clawing back FEMA-managed funds designated for migrant services, stripping millions from New York City and other municipalities. This decision follows a federal judge's ruling that FEMA is not obligated to continue disbursing these funds, effectively greenlighting the administration’s politically motivated crackdown.

However, the justification for this move is based on false claims that disaster relief funds were being misused for migrant services. In reality, the Shelter and Services Program (SSP)—the funding source in question—is entirely separate from FEMA's disaster relief budget and was explicitly allocated by Congress for migrant aid.

The Trump administration’s decision to reclaim the funds will destabilize local programs that rely on this federal support, exacerbating homelessness and humanitarian crises in major cities.

🔍 Consequences:

• False Justification for Cuts: The administration’s claim that migrant aid is depleting FEMA disaster relief funds is demonstrably false. The SSP budget is separate, pre-approved by Congress, and managed by FEMA in partnership with U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP).

• Humanitarian Crisis Worsens: NYC and other cities depend on these funds to provide shelter and services to asylum seekers and other migrants released from federal custody. Withholding funds will leave thousands stranded without support.

• Legal Precedent for More Clawbacks: This ruling may embolden further cuts to programs intended to support vulnerable populations, all under the guise of “efficiency.”

🚨 Why This Matters:

This is more than just budget cuts—it’s a deliberate effort to mislead the public while attacking humanitarian aid for political gain. By misrepresenting the nature of FEMA’s funding, the Trump administration is pushing a narrative designed to divide Americans and manufacture outrage over federal migrant support.

The clawback sets a dangerous precedent: If the government can simply strip pre-allocated funds from cities, nothing is safe. This is how authoritarianism tightens its grip—not just through overt power grabs, but through the slow erosion of funding and services that uphold stability.

📌 Sources:

• FEMA: Shelter and Services Program Overview

• American Immigration Council: FEMA’s Role in Migrant Assistance: Exploring the Shelter and Services Program

• AP News: FACT FOCUS: FEMA funding to New York City to assist migrants is misrepresented

DOGE v. NIH

🔴 UPDATE: February 10, 2025

In a significant legal development, U.S. District Judge Angel Kelley has issued a temporary restraining order (TRO) against the Trump administration's plan to cap indirect costs for National Institutes of Health (NIH) grants at 15%. This policy change threatened to drastically reduce funding for essential overhead expenses at research institutions, including facility maintenance and staff salaries.

The TRO was granted in response to a lawsuit filed by attorneys general from 22 states, who argued that the cap would devastate public health research by underfunding the necessary infrastructure that supports scientific studies. They contended that the administration's unilateral decision was unlawful and would halt progress in critical areas such as gene editing, vaccine development, and treatments for diseases like cancer and addiction.

Judge Kelley's order temporarily halts the implementation of the funding cap, allowing ongoing and future research projects to continue without the immediate threat of budget shortfalls. This move underscores the judiciary's role in checking executive actions that may overstep legal boundaries and harm public interests.

📌 Sources:

• Politico: Judge temporarily blocks Trump cuts to health research grants

• The Hill: Federal judge grants restraining order on NIH funding cuts

• ABC News: Judge blocks Trump administration's move to cut billions in NIH scientific funding

• U.S. District Court of Massachusetts: Temporary Restraining Order on NIH Funding Freeze

🔴UPDATE: February 10, 2025

In a decisive legal blow to the Trump administration, U.S. District Judge John J. McConnell Jr. has issued a temporary restraining order (TRO) mandating the immediate release of billions in frozen federal funds—including critical biomedical research grants from the National Institutes of Health (NIH) and climate-related programs under the Inflation Reduction Act (IRA).

This order comes after the administration ignored previous directives to release funding already approved and allocated, jeopardizing vital health research and climate initiatives. While the administration claims budget reviews necessitated the freeze, the judge ruled that the withholding of funds was likely unconstitutional and had already caused irreparable harm to public health and scientific progress.

The TRO requires immediate compliance, but given the administration’s past defiance, questions remain: Will they follow the law, or continue their sabotage of public institutions?

📌 Sources:

• AP News: Judge finds Trump administration hasn’t fully followed his order to unfreeze federal spending

• Politico: States accuse Trump administration of continuing to block federal climate funding

• AP News: Second federal judge orders temporary pause to Trump administration efforts to freeze funding

• CourtListener: Temporary Restraining Order Issued Against Trump Administration (Full Text)

📅 Date: February 8, 2025
📰 Action:

In a sweeping attack on America’s scientific infrastructure, Elon Musk’s Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) has orchestrated a massive funding cut at the National Institutes of Health (NIH). The NIH announced a drastic reduction in reimbursements for research overhead costs, slashing the indirect funding cap from an average of nearly 30% to a meager 15%. This move, set to save $4 billion annually, jeopardizes the very foundation of biomedical research across the country.

The cuts hit universities hardest, especially those like Harvard, which previously received up to 69% in overhead funding. These funds are critical for maintaining labs, facilities, and administrative support for research projects that drive innovations in medicine and public health.

🔍 Consequences:

• Stifling Medical Breakthroughs: Cutting overhead funding directly undermines the infrastructure supporting critical research, halting progress on life-saving treatments and innovations.

• University Closures and Tuition Hikes: With billions slashed from their budgets, universities face the impossible choice of cutting research programs or raising tuition, further limiting access to higher education.

• Political Weaponization of Science: This isn’t about “efficiency”—it’s about targeting institutions that the Trump administration and Musk’s cronies see as bastions of progressive thought. By gutting funding, they’re dismantling the scientific community’s ability to challenge misinformation and fight public health crises.

• Global Competitiveness at Risk: While the U.S. guts its research infrastructure, other countries will surge ahead in medical innovation. This isn’t just academic—it’s a national security threat.

🚨 Why This Matters:

This isn’t a budget cut. It’s a calculated attack on America’s future. Biomedical research isn’t just about scientific curiosity—it’s the backbone of public health, national security, and economic growth. By slashing NIH funding, DOGE is dismantling the systems that keep Americans healthy and the country competitive on the global stage.

This is how authoritarian regimes tighten their grip—by silencing scientists, cutting off funding, and eroding the institutions that challenge their narrative. If they can decimate scientific research today, what’s next? Education? Public health programs? The very knowledge that empowers us to resist?

📌 Sources:

• Politico: NIH slashes funding for research overhead, leaving universities scrambling

• Forbes: New NIH ‘Indirect Costs’ Funding Cuts Threaten Universities, Science

• Science: NIH slashes overhead payments for research, sparking outrage

• Bloomberg: Outcry as NIH Plans $4Billion Cut to Reimburse Scientists

• The Guardian: Trump administration to cut billions in medical research funding

DOGE v. GSA

📅 Date: February 9, 2025
📰 Action:

In its latest attack on the federal government, Elon Musk’s Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) has zeroed in on the General Services Administration (GSA), aggressively working to terminate thousands of federal office leases across the country. Under the leadership of Nicole Hollander, DOGE is targeting roughly 7,500 federal offices, aiming to slash real estate costs—but this isn’t just about budget cuts.

The true intent? To make working conditions for federal employees so unbearable that they quit. By closing offices and forcing long, grueling commutes or unsafe working environments, DOGE is engineering a mass exodus from the federal workforce. It’s a ruthless strategy Musk perfected during his hostile takeover of Twitter, and now he’s applying it to dismantle the government from the inside.

Already, 22 federal leases have been canceled, saving an estimated $44.6 million. But the human cost is far greater: thousands of federal employees are being pushed out, their livelihoods disrupted, and their ability to serve the public systematically undermined.

🔍 Consequences:

• Workforce Purge: By making conditions intolerable, DOGE is coercing federal employees into resigning, clearing the way for unqualified loyalists to take their place.

• Government Disruption: Essential federal operations are being destabilized as offices are closed, and employees are scattered or forced to work in unsafe environments.

• Erosion of Public Service: With fewer qualified employees, the effectiveness of federal programs and services will deteriorate, harming the American people.

🚨 Why This Matters:

This isn’t just a budget-cutting measure—it’s a deliberate attempt to gut the federal government. By forcing federal employees out, Musk and Trump are hollowing out institutions that protect, serve, and uphold democracy. This is how fascism works: not by burning down the government overnight, but by slowly choking it from within, making it impossible for public servants to do their jobs.

They’re not just cutting costs—they’re cutting democracy at the knees.

📌 Sources:

• AP News: Trump and Musk demand termination of federal office leases through General Services Administration

• Fortune: DOGE looks to shrink the federal workforce by making buildings and commutes ‘so crappy’ that employees will quit, report says

• Bisnow: Elon Musk's DOGE Says It Has Terminated 22 Federal Leases

DOGE v. Department of Labor

🔴 UPDATE: February 8, 2025

In a blow to labor protections, U.S. District Judge John Bates has declined to block Elon Musk's Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) from accessing the Department of Labor’s systems. The lawsuit, filed by several labor unions, argued that DOGE's infiltration posed a direct threat to worker rights and sensitive data. However, Judge Bates ruled that the unions lacked legal standing to challenge the administration’s actions.

This decision clears the path for Musk's operatives to continue their so-called “efficiency reviews,” which critics warn will gut workplace safety regulations, wage enforcement, and union protections. Legal experts argue that while this is a setback, further lawsuits are likely as DOGE ramps up its assault on federal agencies.

📌 Sources:

· Reuters: US judge declines to block Elon Musk’s DOGE from Labor Department systems

· Politico: Labor unions expand lawsuit to protect multiple agencies from DOGE

· AP News: A federal judge won't immediately block DOGE access to the US Labor Department

📅 Date: January 29, 2025
📰 Action:

The Department of Labor, responsible for enforcing workplace safety, wage laws, and labor rights, became one of the first targets of Musk’s DOGE team. On January 29, 2025, DOGE operatives were granted access to the department’s employment records, contractor databases, and regulatory enforcement systems under the guise of improving “efficiency.”

Labor unions and government watchdogs immediately raised alarms, warning that DOGE’s involvement jeopardizes the confidentiality of worker complaints, whistleblower protections, and ongoing investigations into wage theft and unsafe working conditions.

🕒How We Got Here:

• January 29, 2025: DOGE requested full access to the Department of Labor’s employment records, contractor databases, and regulatory enforcement logs. The request raised alarms within the department, as these systems contain confidential worker complaints, ongoing investigations, and whistleblower reports.

• February 1, 2025: Labor unions filed an emergency lawsuit to block DOGE’s access, arguing that Musk’s team had no legal authority to oversee labor enforcement mechanisms and that granting them access posed a serious risk of data misuse and political targeting.

• February 3, 2025: Internal emails revealed that some DOGE officials had already entered Labor Department offices, despite the legal challenge still pending. Reports indicate that Musk’s operatives were seen conducting “efficiency reviews” of key agency divisions, fueling concerns that mass layoffs and deregulation were imminent.

• February 5, 2025: The Justice Department, under Trump’s appointees, defended DOGE’s involvement, claiming that as an advisory body, it was simply offering “recommendations” to improve efficiency. However, leaked memos suggest that DOGE is actively working to restructure the agency’s enforcement priorities.

🔍 Consequences:

• Threat to Worker Protections: DOGE’s involvement could lead to rolling back key labor protections, making it easier for corporations to exploit workers without consequence.

• Data Privacy Risks: The department’s systems hold sensitive information on millions of workers, including whistleblowers and union organizers, now vulnerable to misuse.

• Union-Busting Agenda: Critics fear that DOGE’s real goal is to undermine labor unions and erode collective bargaining rights in favor of corporate interests.

🚨 Why This Matters:

This isn’t about “efficiency”—it’s about dismantling the very institutions that protect American workers. By embedding DOGE within the Department of Labor, the Trump administration is paving the way for corporate exploitation and the erosion of labor rights that took decades to secure.

This is how authoritarian regimes operate: they don’t just silence dissent; they hollow out the systems that protect the people. If DOGE can undermine workplace protections today, no labor rights are safe tomorrow.

📌 Sources:

• AFL-CIO: Complaint - AFL-CIO v. DOL & DOGE (PDF)

• Reuters: Union asks judge to block Elon Musk's DOGE from Labor Dept systems

DOGE v. Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB)

📅 Date: February 7, 2025

📰 Action:

In yet another aggressive push to dismantle government oversight, Elon Musk’s Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) has targeted the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB)—the federal agency designed to protect consumers from financial fraud and predatory practices.

On February 7, three DOGE-aligned officials were embedded within the CFPB as "senior advisers." Their arrival coincides with Musk’s long-standing goal of abolishing the agency, which he has derided as a bureaucratic obstacle to free enterprise. The newly installed interim CFPB director, Scott Bessent, wasted no time in ordering an immediate freeze on all agency activity, including rulemaking, enforcement actions, and litigation.

One of the major casualties of this shutdown? A critical rule designed to prevent data brokers from selling Social Security numbers and other sensitive personal data—a regulation that was in its final stages of approval before DOGE’s intervention.

🔍 Consequences:

• Financial Protections Under Attack – With enforcement actions paused, corporations accused of fraudulent lending, illegal fees, and consumer exploitation may now face no consequences for their actions.

• Cybersecurity Risks – The halted rule on data brokers leaves Americans vulnerable to identity theft, as companies can continue selling sensitive financial information.

• CFPB Employee Backlash – The CFPB employees’ union has raised alarm over DOGE’s intervention, citing threats to consumer safety and economic stability. Many fear mass layoffs could be next.

• Legal Roadblocks to Full Dismantling – While Musk has pushed for outright abolition of the CFPB, legal experts note that Congress alone has the power to eliminate the agency—a process that would face major legal and political challenges.

🚨 Why This Matters:

The CFPB was created to protect everyday Americans from predatory lenders, fraudulent financial products, and corporate abuse. Musk’s DOGE takeover is part of a broader strategy to strip away consumer protections and consolidate financial power in the hands of corporate elites.

This move isn’t just about “efficiency”—it’s about crippling the institutions that hold financial giants accountable. If DOGE succeeds in neutralizing the CFPB, what’s next? The SEC? The FDIC? The entire financial regulatory system?

This isn’t reform. This is sabotage.

📌 Sources:

• Politico: Musk’s team lands at consumer bureau

• The Verge: Data brokers can keep selling your social security number, says new CFPB chief

• Wall Street Journal: Can DOGE ‘Delete’ a Federal Agency? The Legal Hurdles Ahead

DOGE v. FBI

🔴 UPDATE: February 7, 2025

In a dramatic legal showdown, a federal judge has temporarily blocked the public release of FBI agents’ identities involved in the January 6 Capitol riot investigations. This move follows lawsuits filed by anonymous agents, who warned that releasing their names could expose them to harassment, threats, or worse. The restraining order, issued by U.S. District Judge Jia Cobb, halts any public dissemination of the list until at least the end of March 2025, when further hearings will determine the legal outcome.

While the Justice Department agreed not to make the names public, critics argue the very demand for this list represents political intimidation and sets a dangerous precedent for targeting law enforcement officials based on the cases they investigate.

Despite internal resistance, the FBI ultimately complied with the administration's directive, providing a list of 5,000 to 6,000 agents, identified only by employee numbers and roles. However, unease persists within the bureau, as fears grow that this could lead to retaliation against agents involved in politically sensitive investigations.

This escalating confrontation is a direct threat to the independence of federal law enforcement, and legal experts warn that these actions mirror the behavior of authoritarian regimes—where loyalty to leadership trumps the rule of law.

📌 Sources:

• Reuters: Judge orders overnight pause on potential naming of January 6 FBI agents

• AP News: Justice Department says it won't release the names of FBI agents who worked on Jan. 6 riot cases

• The Guardian: FBI gives in to justice department demand for list of January 6 investigators

📅 Date: January 31, 2025

📰 Action:

In a move that has sent shockwaves through the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI), the Trump administration, under Acting Deputy Attorney General Emil Bove, has demanded a comprehensive list of all FBI agents who participated in the investigations of the January 6 Capitol attack. This directive is part of a broader initiative to address alleged "weaponization" within federal law enforcement.

The FBI's acting leadership initially resisted this demand, citing concerns over agent safety and the potential for political retribution. However, under mounting pressure, the FBI provided a list identifying employees by their numbers instead of names. This action has led to significant internal unrest and legal challenges from FBI personnel.

🔍 Consequences:

• Internal Turmoil: The demand has led to significant unrest within the FBI, with agents expressing concerns over potential political retribution and the erosion of the bureau's independence.

• Legal Challenges: In response to the directive, FBI employees have filed lawsuits seeking to block the collection and potential dissemination of their identities, citing concerns over safety and potential retaliation.

• Leadership Conflict: The situation has led to a standoff between the Justice Department and FBI leadership, with accusations of "insubordination" and concerns over the potential dismissal of senior FBI officials.

🚨 Why This Matters:

This unprecedented demand undermines the foundational principles of an independent justice system. By targeting agents involved in politically sensitive investigations, the administration risks eroding public trust in federal law enforcement and setting a dangerous precedent for the politicization of justice.

Such actions are characteristic of authoritarian regimes, where loyalty to leadership is prioritized over adherence to the rule of law. This move not only threatens the careers and safety of dedicated public servants but also poses a significant risk to the integrity of democratic institutions.

📌 Sources:

• Politico: Justice Department official defends demand for FBI agent names, cites 'insubordination'

• Reuters: FBI agents ordered to work on January 6 cases will not face penalties, Justice Department official says

• Associated Press: FBI agents sue over effort to ID employees involved in Trump-related investigations

DOGE v. Department of Education

📅 Date: February 6, 2025

📰 Action:

The Trump administration has set its sights on dismantling the U.S. Department of Education, a long-time goal of the far right. According to internal sources, an executive order is being drafted to strip the department of functions not explicitly mandated by law and transfer remaining responsibilities to state governments or other federal agencies.

Betsy DeVos, Trump’s former Education Secretary and a staunch critic of public education, openly supports the move, calling the department “a bureaucratic waste” and advocating for a system where education is dictated entirely by states and private entities.

The two-part strategy for eliminating the department includes:

1. Shutting down non-statutory functions via executive order.

2. Introducing legislation to abolish the department outright.

While outright dismantling the Department of Education requires congressional approval, the administration’s gradual weakening of the agency is already underway.

🔍 Consequences:

• Loss of Federal Funding for Public Schools: Key programs like Title I (which provides funding to low-income schools) and IDEA (Individuals with Disabilities Education Act) could face severe cuts, harming millions of vulnerable students.

• Massive Job Losses & Institutional Collapse: As part of Trump’s broader push to gut the federal workforce, employees at the Department of Education are being offered buyouts, causing an exodus of career professionals.

• Increased Privatization & School Inequality: By eliminating federal oversight, the administration is clearing the way for charter schools, private institutions, and voucher programs to receive public funding with little accountability—potentially worsening inequality in education.

• Legal & Legislative Battles Ahead: Dismantling the department will require congressional approval, but Trump’s allies are already drafting bills to make it happen. Federal and state lawsuits are expected to challenge these moves.

🚨 Why This Matters:

This isn’t just a cost-cutting measure—it’s an attack on public education itself. The Department of Education plays a critical role in ensuring equal access to education, funding for marginalized students, and federal oversight of discriminatory practices. Weakening or eliminating it isn’t about efficiency—it’s about stripping public schools of resources and funneling them into private hands.

If they succeed in dismantling the Department of Education, what’s next? This is part of a broader push to hollow out government institutions and hand their functions over to private interests with zero accountability. The battle over public education is just beginning—and the consequences could last for generations.

📌 Sources:

• CNN: Trump administration drafting executive order to initiate Department of Education dismantling

• Politico: Former Trump Education Secretary calls for department to be shuttered as cutting spree looks for next target

• The Times: Can Trump shut the Department of Education?

• Wall Street Journal: Trump Advisers Weigh Plan to Dismantle Education Department

DOGE v. Medicaid & Medicare

📅 Date: February 5, 2025

📰 Action:
In yet another disturbing overreach, Elon Musk’s Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) has secured access to the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS)—an agency responsible for providing health insurance to over 140 million Americans. Framed under the guise of rooting out fraud and increasing efficiency, DOGE operatives now have direct access to Medicare’s payment and contracting systems.

While officials claim DOGE’s access is “read-only,” reports indicate that Musk’s team is reviewing organizational structures, staffing, and payment operations—raising alarms about potential interference in one of the nation’s most vital healthcare programs

🔍 Consequences:

• Patient Data at Risk: DOGE’s access to Medicare systems puts the sensitive health information of millions of Americans in the hands of an unelected, unaccountable agency with a track record of reckless behavior.

• Threats to Program Integrity: Critics warn that this is the first step toward dismantling public healthcare programs under the guise of “efficiency,” potentially paving the way for massive privatization efforts or funding cuts.

• Erosion of Public Trust: The presence of DOGE within Medicare has already begun to erode public confidence in the government’s ability to safeguard essential healthcare programs from political manipulation.

🚨 Why This Matters:
This isn’t about efficiency—it’s about control. By embedding DOGE within Medicare, the administration is undermining the integrity of one of America’s most critical healthcare programs. This isn’t just bureaucratic meddling; it’s a calculated effort to destabilize public institutions that millions rely on for survival.

This is how authoritarianism creeps into everyday life—not just by targeting overt symbols of power, but by silently gutting the systems that protect our most vulnerable. If they can compromise Medicare today, no public service is safe tomorrow.

📌 Sources:

• Reuters: DOGE Aides Search Medicare Agency Payment Systems for Fraud

• The Verge: ‘The biggest heist in American history’: DC is just waking up to Elon Musk's takeover

• Wall Street Journal: Elon Musk’s DOGE Targets Medicare and Medicaid Systems

DOGE v. CIA

📅 Date: February 5, 2025

📰 Action:
In a staggering breach of protocol and common sense, the Trump administration requested the names of all CIA employees hired in the past two years—and shockingly, the CIA complied, sending the information via unclassified email to the White House.

While the email contained only first names and last initials, former CIA officials have labeled this a “counterintelligence disaster”, warning that even partial identifiers could easily be cross-referenced to expose sensitive operatives. This reckless request is part of the administration’s broader campaign to purge the federal workforce under the guise of “efficiency,” but the implications for national security are chilling.

🔍 Consequences:

• Compromised National Security: Transmitting names over unsecured channels opens the door to potential foreign intelligence breaches, putting CIA personnel at risk both domestically and abroad.

• Undermining Trust within the Intelligence Community: The CIA’s compliance with this dangerous request has shattered internal morale, raising fears that the agency’s independence is being eroded under political pressure.

• Empowering Authoritarian Control: Collecting employee information from intelligence agencies hints at political purging, a tactic commonly used by authoritarian regimes to replace qualified personnel with loyalists.

🚨 Why This Matters:
This is more than just a lapse in security—it’s a blatant disregard for the safety of America’s intelligence personnel. By demanding sensitive information through unsecured channels, the administration has signaled that political loyalty outweighs national security.

This is how fascism embeds itself in the shadows: by weakening the institutions designed to protect the country and intimidating those who serve in them. When the intelligence community becomes a political target, the entire nation is less safe.

📌 Sources:

• CNN: CIA sent White House unclassified email with names of employees hired in past two years

• Newsweek: Trump Asked CIA to Send Names of Agents in Unclassified Email: Report

DOGE v. Safety Net

📅 Date: January 27, 2025

📰 Action:
In a stunning display of cruelty and incompetence, the Trump administration froze all federal financial assistance, halting essential services like Medicaid, Meals on Wheels, and food stamps. This sweeping decision, orchestrated through the Office of Management and Budget (OMB), came without warning and immediately threw millions of vulnerable Americans into chaos.

The freeze, initiated on January 27, 2025, blocked access to critical services nationwide:

• Medicaid Payments Blocked: Healthcare providers across the country reported being shut out of Medicaid payment portals, threatening medical care for millions of low-income Americans.

• Meals on Wheels and Nutrition Programs Cut Off: Organizations providing food to the elderly and vulnerable populations were suddenly left without funding, endangering food security for countless individuals.

• Food Stamps Frozen: Recipients of Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) benefits were left in limbo, unable to access the resources they depend on for survival.

This wasn’t just administrative oversight—it was a deliberate decision to cut off life-sustaining support for millions, hidden behind a thin veil of “budget reassessment.”

🔍 Consequences:

• Healthcare Crisis: The Medicaid freeze threatened access to medical care for millions, forcing providers to delay services and leaving patients scrambling.

• Food Insecurity: Vulnerable populations relying on Meals on Wheels and SNAP faced immediate food shortages, pushing families and the elderly to the brink of starvation.

• Nationwide Panic: The abrupt freeze sent shockwaves through communities, leaving citizens and organizations alike scrambling to fill the gaps left by the government’s abdication of responsibility.

🚨 Public Outcry and Legal Challenge:
The freeze was met with immediate and fierce backlash:

• Democrats Took to the Courts: Legal challenges were swiftly filed, with Senate Democratic leader Chuck Schumer condemning the move as "lawless, destructive, and cruel." A federal judge temporarily blocked the freeze, citing violations of the Impoundment Control Act of 1974.

• Nationwide Protests: Communities across the country erupted in protest, demanding the immediate restoration of critical services.

• Administration’s Backpedal: Facing overwhelming pressure, the OMB rescinded the memo, but confusion persisted as the administration struggled to contain the fallout.

🚨 Why This Matters:
This wasn’t a bureaucratic glitch—it was a test run for authoritarian control over public welfare. By freezing federal assistance without warning or justification, the administration weaponized government dysfunction against the most vulnerable Americans.

This is how fascism creeps in—not just through overt repression, but by slowly dismantling the systems that protect and serve the public. Cutting off food, healthcare, and basic support is a direct attack on the fabric of democracy, designed to create chaos and consolidate power.

📌 Sources:

• Reuters: Trump aid freeze stirs chaos before it is blocked in court

• CBS News: Judge blocks Trump federal funding freeze on all public loans

• Associated Press: Federal grant freeze: Trump White House rescinds order

• ABC News: Trump White House tries to clarify confusion over abrupt federal assistance freeze

• Healthcare Dive: Lawmakers report states shut out of Medicaid payment portals

  ---

See something we’ve missed? Share it with us. This is our collective record—because we are #TheRelentless, and together, we will hold them accountable.