Trump loves him some statistical improbabilities. As long as we’re doing the math, what are the odds that in 2024 he would win every single district in ever single swing state (none of them went to Harris) by just enough votes to not trigger an automatic hand recount? Statistically off the charts.
What are the odds a bullet from an assault rifle could graze his ear and not only NOT rip it off his head, but cause so little damage there is no visible scar? Virtually impossible.
The math here is devastating because it strips away any “maybe” and leaves only pattern, probability, and proximity.
When misconduct aligns this precisely with a known predator’s timeline, the burden shifts. It’s no longer about proving guilt; it’s about explaining how innocence could possibly fit the facts.
The guilt is obvious. The urgent question is: what does it change if the system is being re-engineered to make him unprosecutable?
We have 3–5 weeks left, maybe less, before the last remaining legal windows close.
If we want accountability, we must dismantle the structural immunity being built around him - before it locks in.
I love the way you use logic in a practical and simple way to help us see the basic facts. Thank you Lukium. I appreciate your endeavors to educate. My brain can “see” the truth sometimes but I don’t have the ability you do to bring it all together and communicate it succinctly so anyone can understand it. Just appreciate your work. 👍
Trump loves him some statistical improbabilities. As long as we’re doing the math, what are the odds that in 2024 he would win every single district in ever single swing state (none of them went to Harris) by just enough votes to not trigger an automatic hand recount? Statistically off the charts.
What are the odds a bullet from an assault rifle could graze his ear and not only NOT rip it off his head, but cause so little damage there is no visible scar? Virtually impossible.
The math here is devastating because it strips away any “maybe” and leaves only pattern, probability, and proximity.
When misconduct aligns this precisely with a known predator’s timeline, the burden shifts. It’s no longer about proving guilt; it’s about explaining how innocence could possibly fit the facts.
The guilt is obvious. The urgent question is: what does it change if the system is being re-engineered to make him unprosecutable?
We have 3–5 weeks left, maybe less, before the last remaining legal windows close.
If we want accountability, we must dismantle the structural immunity being built around him - before it locks in.
I mapped that system here: https://open.substack.com/pub/miriamferfers/p/the-unprosecutable
Guilty of so much ! But what in particular? What goes on the inditement?
At minimum, aiding and abetting Epstein. So, accessory to child sex trafficking.
Why this is not obvious to everyone is beyond me.
I love the way you use logic in a practical and simple way to help us see the basic facts. Thank you Lukium. I appreciate your endeavors to educate. My brain can “see” the truth sometimes but I don’t have the ability you do to bring it all together and communicate it succinctly so anyone can understand it. Just appreciate your work. 👍
Thank you so much, that’s very sweet! To be fair, I’ve been known to not be very succinct at times 🤣
But that’s all that I hope for: to be able to help others make sense of the wild mess we are in.
What if he is not really the president and he could be prosecuted for everything he and his helpers has done!
User Clip: Trump Talking About Elon Musk Knowing About Voting Computers | Video | C-SPAN.org https://share.google/gZ0C943jKiiUyMGwk