Unmasking MAGA, Part 4: The Warhawks
They claimed to defend freedom—but they built a world that runs on force.
↑ Previous Chapter
For most of the modern era, they were the ones behind the wheel.
The corporatists brought the money.
The fake Christians brought the blessing.
But it was the Warhawks who drove the car.
From the end of World War II through the early 2000s, they steered the American right—not with sermons or slogans, but with strategy, doctrine, and war plans.
They weren’t interested in culture wars. They weren’t obsessed with tax codes.
Their mission was grander: preserve the world order, and ensure that order served America.
If corporatists wanted to dismantle regulations, and fake Christians wanted to legislate morality, the Warhawks wanted to reshape the globe.
They believed America was not just powerful—but exceptional.
And they were determined to defend that exceptionalism, even if it meant imposing it.
They took us into Korea, Vietnam, Latin America, the Middle East.
They launched preemptive wars, backed coups, and built alliances that prioritized order over democracy.
And for decades, they defined what it meant to be a Republican.
But wars get expensive. Occupations breed resentment. And eventually, the public gets tired.
By the time the 2000s gave way to Obama’s presidency, the Warhawks had lost their grip.
The War on Terror was collapsing under its own weight.
And the coalition they once commanded was beginning to fracture—making room for something darker to take their place.
Today, many Warhawks have been pushed out, or fled the party altogether.
They didn’t join the fascists. They just lost to them.
And now the machine they built—the surveillance state, the global arsenal, the doctrine of preemption—has been turned inward.
They’re no longer in charge.
But the weapons are still loaded.
And the fascists know exactly where they are.
Who Are They?
They don’t wear camo in the streets.
They wear suits in the Situation Room.
The Warhawks aren’t brawlers or Bible-thumpers. They don’t lead chants or livestream grievances.
They operate from think tanks, Pentagon briefings, and foreign policy panels.
They quote doctrine. They draft white papers. They frame dominance as diplomacy.
But don’t let the credentials fool you.
These are the architects of American empire—military, ideological, and cultural.
They don’t just believe in national defense.
They believe the world should align with America—and that alignment is worth enforcing.
Not all Warhawks are generals. Some are journalists, politicians, lawyers, and pundits.
What unites them isn’t their role—it’s their worldview:
That peace is maintained by power.
That threats are best met overseas, before they reach our shores.
And that America’s global dominance isn’t just a right—but a responsibility.
They don’t dream of civil war.
They dream of preemptive strikes.
They don’t fantasize about collapsing the government.
They build the contingency plan in case it does.
You’ll find them in both parties.
But it was on the right—during the Cold War, the Gulf War, and the War on Terror—where they held the most sway.
And for decades, they were seen as the adults in the room. The steady hands. The patriots.
They saw chaos and tried to impose order.
But the longer they held the reins, the more that order started to look like control.
The more peace started to look like surveillance.
The more “security” came to mean unending war.
They didn’t set out to become the engineers of a militarized state.
But that’s what they built.
And now that state is being repurposed—by people who don’t care about stability, or democracy, or freedom.
The Warhawks aren’t the face of fascism.
But they wrote the doctrine it’s now using.
Origin Story
They didn’t rise from chaos.
They rose from victory.
The Warhawks weren’t forged in rebellion or grievance.
They were born from America’s proudest moment—World War II, the Good War, the just war.
They helped defeat fascism, rebuild the world, and plant the flag of freedom across continents.
And in their eyes, that victory wasn’t just earned—it was sacred.
It wasn’t about glory.
It was about responsibility.
About protecting the future.
About building a world where peace came from strength—and order came from us.
And honestly? At first, they weren’t wrong.
After all, we had defeated fascism.
We had rebuilt Europe.
We had elevated science, created the middle class, and extended the promise of democracy further than it had ever gone before.
It made sense to want to preserve it.
It made sense to believe that the best hope for humanity was a world shaped in America’s image.
But strength has a price.
And over time, protection turned into preemption.
Responsibility turned into entitlement.
And war became not a last resort—but a way of life.
The Warhawks weren’t corrupted by bad values.
They were consumed by their mission.
And the longer it lasted, the more they became willing to justify.
The Cold War
This was the Warhawks’ proving ground.
Not a single battle—but a global doctrine:
Station troops across the planet.
Topple governments that drift toward communism.
Arm dictators who pledge allegiance.
Develop nukes, build alliances, fund insurgencies, and train death squads—anything to hold the line.
Korea. Guatemala. Angola. Chile. Indonesia. El Salvador.
The list of interventions is long. The motives were rarely pure.
But the mission was always the same:
Maintain American dominance. Contain the threat. Export the order.
Vietnam and the Limits of Control
Then came Vietnam—the war they couldn’t spin, win, or walk away from.
It wasn’t just a military failure. It was a spiritual one.
58,000 Americans dead. Hundreds of thousands wounded. Millions of Vietnamese killed.
And for what?
Domestically, the toll was seismic:
Mass protest movements.
The rise of distrust in government.
The exposure of lies like the Gulf of Tonkin.
And a public finally beginning to question the wisdom of endless war.
But the Warhawks didn’t stop.
Oil, Embargoes, and Blowback
In the name of “stability,” they overthrew Iran’s democratic government in 1953—installing the Shah and building the resentment that would explode into the 1979 revolution.
In the name of “partnership,” they aligned unconditionally with Israel—helping provoke the 1973 oil embargo that sent U.S. energy prices into chaos.
In the name of “freedom,” they backed the Contras in Nicaragua, supported death squads across Latin America, and funneled weapons through black markets and backchannels.
They weren’t just fighting communism.
They were reshaping the Global South—regime by regime, often leaving behind blood-soaked vacuums that birthed more instability than they ever contained.
The American people paid the price:
Gas shortages.
Hostage crises.
Staggering inflation.
An international reputation increasingly defined by hypocrisy.
And a growing sense that our strength abroad was weakening us at home
But none of it broke the Warhawks’ faith in force.
Not Always Wrong, Not Always Driven by Impuse
To be clear—not every intervention was a catastrophe.
In Bosnia and Kosovo, American-led NATO missions helped stop genocide during the 1990s.
In Rwanda, the failure to intervene haunts us still.
But for every moral stand, there were a dozen opportunistic blunders.
Most of the time, the Warhawks chose order over democracy—and got neither.
The War on Terror and the Rise of the Surveillance State
Then came 9/11.
The Warhawks had spent decades preparing for Soviet tanks in Berlin or missiles in Cuba.
They weren’t ready for box cutters and hijacked planes.
But they adapted the only way they knew how:
Invade Afghanistan.
Invade Iraq.
Build black sites.
Expand the Pentagon.
Drone strikes.
And declare a global war with no defined enemy and no expiration date.
But over time, the truth emerged:
Iraq was based on lies.
Afghanistan was unwinnable.
Torture was normalized, the pictures of Abu Ghraib were haunting.
And every new terror group was just the shadow of a failed policy past.
The War on Terror didn’t just unleash military force abroad—it rewired civil society.
At home, they built the architecture of a modern police state:
The Patriot Act.
The creation of the Department of Homeland Security.
No-fly lists.
Mass warrantless surveillance.
The surveillance state metastasized—justified by fear, funded by blank checks, and backed by both parties.
But the victories never came.
There was no endgame.
Just more troops, more spending, more flag-draped coffins.
Their Fall from Grace
By the 2010s, even the Warhawks’ most loyal defenders had run out of patience.
The American public was exhausted.
The costs—human, economic, and moral—had piled too high.
The Iraq War had been built on lies.
Afghanistan dragged on with no end in sight.
And while veterans struggled at home, defense contractors made billions.
Then came Obama—and with him, a new chapter.
Yes, he maintained much of the surveillance infrastructure.
Yes, drone strikes continued.
But politically, the tide was turning.
And when birtherism erupted on the right, it wasn’t the Warhawks who captured the base’s imagination.
It was the fascists.
By the mid-2010s, the Warhawks weren’t leading anymore.
They were being replaced—first by libertarians, then by conspiracy theorists, and finally, by Trump.
The generals and strategists who once defined Republican strength found themselves politically homeless:
Rejected by a party they helped build.
Loathed by a base that now cheered authoritarian strongmen.
And stranded by Democrats who had moved away from interventionism.
They weren’t dethroned by ideology.
They were replaced by impulse.
But the machine they built—the war state, the surveillance state, the doctrine of dominance—remains.
Eisenhower—who stood at the glorious birth of the Warhawks—warned us to guard against the unwarranted influence of the military-industrial complex.
We ignored him at our own peril.
And now?
What’s left of the Warhawks in MAGA has been reduced to three obsessions:
Defending Israel—not as a matter of strategy or peacekeeping, but as a crusade. One driven by ideology, evangelical fervor, and political theater.
Profiting off Ukraine—not out of solidarity with democratic resistance, but to keep defense contractors paid and the fantasy of American leadership alive.
Threatening Iran—not as part of a coherent security policy, but as a reflexive scapegoat, recycled endlessly to stoke fear, posture strength, and court war.
The vision is gone.
The doctrine is dead.
All that remains is a reflex: fund the war, arm the ally, call it freedom—no matter who gets crushed along the way.
What Are Their Core Values?
Strip away the doctrine.
Ignore the uniforms.
What you’re left with is a worldview built on five pillars:
Not faith.
Not profit.
Not hate.
But control.
Not chaos in the streets—but stability on our terms.
Not submission to God—but allegiance to nation.
Not conspiracy—but preemption.
They didn’t see American dominance as entitlement.
They saw it as responsibility—earned through sacrifice, and necessary for global order.
But the longer they held that belief, the more twisted it became—until leadership became dominance, and freedom became obedience.
Here’s what they believe, whether they admit it or not:
Power Is Peace
To the Warhawks, peace is not the absence of conflict.
It’s the presence of overwhelming force.
They don’t believe diplomacy works unless backed by firepower.
They don’t trust international cooperation unless America is in charge.
And they don’t see restraint as wisdom—they see it as weakness.
That’s why they:
Built hundreds of bases across the world
Spent more on defense than the next ten nations combined
Treat “readiness” as a bottomless budget line, no matter the cost
They don’t like war.
But they don’t trust peace unless it’s under American boots.
Order Is More Important Than Democracy
The Warhawks say they believe in democracy.
But look at who they’ve supported:
The Shah of Iran
Pinochet in Chile
Suharto in Indonesia
Mubarak in Egypt
Dozens more like them
If a democratic government threatens U.S. interests, it becomes expendable.
If an autocrat plays ball, he becomes a “strategic partner.”
They talk about freedom.
But they define it as alignment with us.
Anything else? That’s a threat to “stability.”
Threats Must Be Neutralized—Before They Exist
They don’t wait for attack. They plan for it.
They don’t wait for proof. They act on suspicion.
From Iraq’s “weapons of mass destruction” to drone strikes on “potential militants,”
the Warhawk mindset is simple:
If it might become a threat, treat it like one now.
That’s how we ended up:
Invading countries that had nothing to do with 9/11
Supporting coups to block hypothetical shifts toward communism
Building surveillance systems that spy on everyone, just in case
They see preemption as prudence.
But in practice, it looks a lot like paranoia with a blank check.
Security Justifies Secrecy
In the Warhawk worldview, the more power you have, the less you should explain yourself.
That’s how you get:
Secret drone kill lists
CIA black sites
Classified torture programs
Mass domestic surveillance rubber-stamped by secret courts
They believe transparency is dangerous, oversight is naive, and accountability is a luxury.
When questioned, they invoke one word: trust.
But trust without scrutiny isn’t patriotism. It’s permission.
America’s Role Is to Lead—Even If No One Asked
They don’t just believe in American greatness.
They believe the world is better off when it’s shaped by American hands.
To them, exporting American power is a gift:
Our systems.
Our corporations.
Our values.
But when people reject the gift?
The Warhawks see it as betrayal—or worse, rebellion.
This isn’t about nationalism.
It’s about imperial paternalism—a belief that the world needs us, even when it doesn’t want us.
And if the world resists?
There’s always a carrier group nearby.
They don’t see themselves as tyrants.
They see themselves as guardians.
But in their shadow, democracy withers, truth disappears, and war becomes tradition.
They built their values on duty, strength, and peace through order.
But in practice, they left behind a machine that answers every question with force—and punishes anyone who asks why.
The fascists don’t need to rebuild that machine.
They just need to flip the switch.
Key Figures
They didn’t rally the base.
They briefed the president.
The Warhawks weren’t demagogues or megachurch preachers.
They were generals, strategists, advisors, and statesmen—men who didn’t need to scream because they already had the launch codes.
They didn’t seek the spotlight.
They shaped the doctrine.
They wrote the speeches.
They directed the fire.
Here are the architects, enablers, and icons of America’s military-industrial age:
The Architects of Doctrine
Dwight D. Eisenhower – Supreme Allied Commander turned U.S. President, and the paradox at the heart of the Warhawk legacy. He won the war that gave them birth—and issued the most famous warning about their future. His farewell address coined the phrase “military-industrial complex.” They built it anyway.
George Kennan – Architect of the Cold War “containment” strategy. His Long Telegram and X Article shaped U.S. foreign policy for decades, laying the ideological groundwork for American interventionism—though he later warned it had gone too far.
Henry Kissinger – National Security Advisor and Secretary of State under Nixon and Ford. Mastermind of realpolitik, responsible for backing authoritarian regimes in Latin America, prolonging the Vietnam War, and opening relations with China—always in the name of “stability.” A Nobel Peace Prize winner with a death toll.
The Generals Who Made It Real
Curtis LeMay – The godfather of strategic bombing, who firebombed Japan and later pushed for aggressive nuclear posture against the USSR. His doctrine: “bomb them back to the Stone Age.”
Colin Powell – Decorated general turned Secretary of State. He lent bipartisan credibility to the Warhawks—but also helped sell the Iraq War on false intelligence. His “Powell Doctrine” emphasized overwhelming force and clear objectives—but was later abandoned.
David Petraeus – Poster child of the Iraq and Afghanistan surges. Credited with shaping counterinsurgency doctrine (COIN), he presided over a strategy that prolonged occupation while failing to deliver lasting peace. Later ran the CIA—until he fell from grace.
The Civilian Enablers
Dick Cheney – The most powerful vice president in modern history. Architect of post-9/11 foreign policy, champion of torture, black sites, and warrantless surveillance. Turned the War on Terror into a doctrine of endless war and corporate profit.
Donald Rumsfeld – Secretary of Defense under both Ford and Bush. Oversaw the Iraq invasion and pushed for a “light footprint” war that quickly collapsed into chaos. Famously said, “You go to war with the army you have”—as soldiers died due to lack of armor.
John Bolton – National Security Advisor and longtime neoconservative hawk. Advocated for regime change in Iraq, Iran, North Korea, and more. Still defends the use of preemptive force—no matter the blowback.
Condoleezza Rice – National Security Advisor and later Secretary of State under Bush. Key player in shaping the post-9/11 world, justifying the Iraq invasion, and selling it to the public with terms like “mushroom cloud” and “axis of evil.”
The Think Tank Class
Paul Wolfowitz – Deputy Secretary of Defense under Bush. Chief architect of the Iraq War. Believed in exporting democracy through force and insisted the invasion would “pay for itself.” It didn’t.
Robert Kagan – Neoconservative intellectual and co-founder of the Project for the New American Century (PNAC), which called for American global dominance before 9/11—and got it after.
Bill Kristol – PNAC signatory and Iraq War cheerleader. Used media platforms to push aggressive foreign policy and discredit critics. Helped turn neoconservatism into a brand.
The Surveillance Architects
Michael Hayden – Director of both the NSA and the CIA. Oversaw the expansion of mass domestic surveillance and drone warfare. A career intelligence officer who helped codify the surveillance state.
James Clapper – Director of National Intelligence under Obama. Defended warrantless surveillance programs revealed by Edward Snowden. Famously lied to Congress about data collection on U.S. citizens.
The Last Warhawk Standing
Lindsey Graham – Once a classic post-9/11 Warhawk, Graham built his career on military intervention, defense spending, and fierce loyalty to U.S. global power. He was John McCain’s right-hand man—and once called Trump “a race-baiting, xenophobic, religious bigot.”
Then he folded.
Now one of Trump’s most loyal foot soldiers, Graham continues to push hawkish foreign policy—including unconditional support for Israel and escalating rhetoric around Iran and China—but in service of a regime that no longer shares his old values.
His evolution is the Warhawk arc in miniature: righteous intent, strategic power, moral compromise—and full assimilation into authoritarianism.
The Warhawk Reengineered
Marco Rubio – A textbook foreign policy hawk in the post-9/11 era, Rubio built his brand confronting authoritarian regimes abroad. But under Trump, he became something else entirely: a perfect specimen of what happens when Warhawk doctrine is repurposed for fascist goals. As Secretary of State, he’s helped disappear immigrants into CECOT without due process, revoke visas and green cards based on protected speech, and treat domestic dissent as a national security threat. He doesn’t just channel the Warhawk mindset—he proves what happens when its tools are handed to a regime not focused on exporting order, but on enforcing it at home with maximum power and minimum accountability.
Honorable Mentions: The Bipartisan Consensus
Hillary Clinton – While not a Warhawk in the traditional sense, she voted for the Iraq War, pushed intervention in Libya, and defended drone warfare. Her legacy represents how deep Warhawk doctrine ran—even into the Democratic establishment.
Joe Biden – A long-time foreign policy centrist who supported the Iraq War and chaired the Senate Foreign Relations Committee. Though more restrained today, his earlier record reflects the Warhawk consensus that once dominated both parties.
Warhawks didn’t build the fascist coalition.
But they built the tools it now uses.
They normalized the targeted killings, endless deployments, deep secrecy, and unchecked executive power.
And now the next regime is ready to pick up where they left off—with none of the restraint, and all of the weapons.
What’s Their Role in the Coalition?
They’re not in the driver’s seat anymore.
But the engine still runs on what they built.
The Warhawks don’t set the agenda.
They don’t command the base.
And most of their old guard has either fled the movement or been replaced by those with no interest in strategy, restraint, or international norms.
But make no mistake—they are still part of the machine.
Because while fascists scream for violence, fake Christians demand obedience, and corporatists chase profit, it’s the Warhawk legacy that makes all of it scalable.
The surveillance infrastructure.
The global military footprint.
The doctrine of preemption.
The normalization of executive war powers.
The idea that force—not law, not diplomacy—is the most effective form of leadership.
These aren’t MAGA innovations.
They’re Warhawk hand-me-downs.
And even the Warhawks who stayed—like Lindsey Graham—aren’t leading.
They’re clinging to relevance by softening their stance on the very authoritarian regimes they built their legacy fighting against while whitewashing fascism at home.
Meanwhile, figures like Marco Rubio have become something else entirely: living proof that Warhawk doctrine can be seamlessly absorbed into fascist authoritarianism with zero resistance.
The coalition doesn’t need the Warhawks’ permission.
It just needs their playbook.
And in Trump’s America, that playbook has already been rewritten—not to preserve global order, but to impose domestic control.
If You Believe in This Fight, Help Keep It Alive
There’s still more below, I just need a moment of your time.
The American Manifesto isn’t backed by corporations. There are no ads, no paywalls, no billionaires funding it.
It’s just one person, fighting like hell to expose the truth and give you the weapons to push back.
If you value this work—if you want this movement to keep growing, keep calling out fascism without fear, and keep fighting for the future we deserve—then I need your support.
Join the fight. Become a supporter. Every contribution keeps this mission alive.
Because silence is surrender. We do not surrender. We are #TheRelentless.
What Is Their Relationship With Other Subgroups?
The Warhawks used to lead.
Now they’re just part of the background hum—tolerated, invoked when needed, and otherwise ignored.
Their doctrine of American power once shaped the entire right-wing movement.
Today, the coalition doesn’t need their ideology. It just needs their infrastructure.
Here’s how the subgroups relate to them now:
✅ Alignment
Corporatists
It’s always been a marriage of convenience—and funding.
The Warhawks need defense budgets. The Corporatists need defense contracts.
Together, they’ve spent decades turning war into business and business into war.
Today, they still align around foreign military aid, defense industry subsidies, and the permanent expansion of “security” spending.
Fake Christians
The alliance here is more spiritual than strategic—but still durable.
Fake Christians have long sanctified war as divine mission: good versus evil, order versus chaos, America versus the heathens.
They bless the bombs and praise the troops—and in return, the Warhawks give them enemies to rally against: Muslims, “godless” communists, anti-Israel activists.
Together, they keep Christian nationalism armed, righteous, and well-funded.
❌ Divergence
Red Pillers
These two share a fetish for power—but not discipline.
Red Pillers see war as cosplay and domination as identity.
Warhawks see war as doctrine and domination as obligation.
To the Warhawks, Red Pillers are unserious, undisciplined, and destabilizing.
To the Red Pillers, Warhawks are washed-up relics with too many rules and not enough rage.
They both want strength—but speak entirely different languages.
Libertarians
This was always a fragile alliance—now it’s just incoherence.
Libertarians believe in limited government, privacy, and individual freedom.
Warhawks believe in surveillance, intervention, and state power.
The Patriot Act alone should’ve been a dealbreaker.
Today, they may share an anti-China stance or support for arming Ukraine—but when it comes to civil liberties or government overreach, they are fundamentally opposed.
The only reason this alliance still exists is because both sides hate the left more than they hate each other.
⚪ Neutral
Fascists
This relationship is cold, cautious, and deeply ironic.
The Warhawks built their legacy crushing fascism abroad.
Now they watch it rise at home—and say nothing.
Fascists tolerate the Warhawks because they’ve inherited their arsenal.
But they don’t trust them. They don’t need their lectures. And they sure as hell don’t respect their restraint.
Conspiracy Theorists
The Warhawks aren’t ideologically aligned here—but they benefit from the chaos.
Conspiracy theorists hate the deep state—but rarely question the military budget.
The Warhawks see them as destabilizing and irrational.
But as long as the conspiracies fuel paranoia and justify surveillance, they’re useful enough to ignore.
Blue-Collar Workers
Once, the Warhawks relied on working-class patriotism to sustain their wars.
But decades of failed interventions, hollow promises, and veterans abandoned by the system have strained that relationship.
Today, most Blue-Collar Workers don’t oppose the military—but they no longer believe the people giving the orders have their best interests in mind.
The loyalty has thinned. The reverence has faded. What remains is habit, not trust.
Exploiting Wedge Issues
They used to lead. Now they just haunt the movement they helped build.
The Warhawks aren’t calling the shots anymore—but their fingerprints are still on everything.
Surveillance. Militarization. Executive power.
They build the tools. The fascists inherit them.
But their relationships with the rest of the coalition?
Unstable. Opportunistic. Ripe for collapse.
Here’s where to drive the wedge:
Libertarians Want Liberty—Warhawks Engineer Control
Libertarians claim to hate big government.
But the Warhawks give it its biggest tools:
The Patriot Act
Warrantless NSA surveillance
Secret courts
Drone strikes
Indefinite detention
They don’t just enable the security state. They are the security state.
Wedge angle:
“You talk about freedom. They tap your phone, read your emails, and call it patriotism.”
Red Pillers Want a Culture War—Warhawks Just Want a Win
Red Pillers crave moral clarity, tribal loyalty, and a war for identity.
But Warhawks don’t care who shares their values—they care who gets the job done.
They arm feminists in uniform.
They train Muslim forces.
They work with anyone who furthers the mission—even if it means embracing the very ideologies Red Pillers claim to hate.
Wedge angle:
“You think they’re fighting for your worldview. They think your worldview is a distraction.”
Conspiracy Theorists Hate the Deep State—Warhawks Are the Deep State
QAnon rages about global cabals, black sites, secret intel, and government overreach.
The Warhawks? That is their Tuesday.
They build the surveillance apparatus. They write the playbooks. They staff the agencies.
And now they pretend to be on your side.
Wedge angle:
“You’re fighting the deep state. They are the deep state—with a PR makeover.”
Fascists Worship Strength—Warhawks See You as a Liability
Fascists crave domination.
But the Warhawks build their legacy fighting fascism—real fascism—across Europe, Asia, and the Middle East.
They don’t admire your rallies. They roll their eyes.
They think your ideology is unstable, your optics are a mess, and your grip on power is weak.
They tolerate you—for now.
But only until you embarrass them on the world stage.
Wedge angle:
“You think they respect your movement. They see you as cannon fodder with branding issues.”
Blue-Collar Workers Show Up—and Get Chewed Up
You fight the wars. You bury the dead.
Then come the layoffs, the PTSD, the broken VA system—and defense contractors posting record profits.
The Warhawks sell your patriotism to the highest bidder.
And when you come home, they’ve already moved on to the next deployment.
Wedge angle:
“You think you’re defending America. They’re just expanding a business model.”
The Warhawks don’t need loyalty.
They need leverage.
And the second you stop being useful—they leave you in the rubble and call it strategy.
Creating a Sense of Betrayal
You were told you were defending freedom.
That America needed you.
That power was a responsibility—and you were one of the few willing to carry it.
But if you've ever looked back and wondered what all the sacrifice was for—
you’re not alone.
Here are the values many Warhawks still believe in—and how the movement has betrayed every single one:
Value: Peace Through Strength
You believe peace doesn’t come from weakness—it comes from deterrence.
You believe the world is safer when America leads with confidence and resolve.
So do we.
But what’s being done in your name isn’t peace.
It’s permanent war—wars with no objective, no victory, no end.
Your legacy was supposed to be stability.
Instead, it’s surveillance, drone strikes, and unaccountable power with no exit plan.
If you still believe strength should serve peace—can you call this peace?
Value: American Leadership as a Global Good
You believe America isn’t perfect—but it’s better than the alternatives.
That our system, our values, our way of life—flawed though they are—can still be a force for good in the world.
But what’s being exported now isn’t freedom.
It’s chaos. Arms deals. Corporate extraction.
Dictatorships with American flags in the background.
The world doesn’t look at us as liberators anymore.
They look at us the way we once looked at empires.
If you still believe in the power of our example—how did we become the warning?
Value: Preemption to Prevent Disaster
You were taught that waiting can cost lives.
That it’s better to act decisively than to regret hesitation.
But preemption has become the excuse for everything.
Lies about weapons of mass destruction.
Targeted killings based on unverified intel.
Laws bent in the name of speed.
Civilians erased under “signature strikes.”
We’re not stopping threats anymore.
We’re generating them—then funding the response.
If you still believe in smart, strategic action—why does it always end with someone else paying the price?
Value: Duty to Protect the Homeland
You believe your service matters.
That America must remain vigilant, strong, and protected.
But while you carried that duty, they built a system that turned inward:
Spying on American citizens.
Disappearing immigrants into black-site systems.
Labeling political dissent as domestic extremism.
The tools meant to protect us are now used to silence us.
If your oath was to defend the Constitution—who’s defending it now?
Value: Strategic Clarity Over Political Theater
You believe foreign policy isn’t a popularity contest.
That restraint is not weakness. That leadership takes discipline.
But your doctrine has been hijacked by opportunists:
Using your legacy to sell arms to strongmen.
Turning your credibility into a marketing line.
Starting fights they don’t intend to finish—so long as the cameras are rolling.
You didn’t build this playbook so someone like Trump could wave it around and call it strength.
If you still believe strategy matters—how long can you stay in a coalition that treats power like a reality show prop?
You were told you were the adults in the room.
That you were the steady hands.
That you were defending order, not manufacturing chaos.
But look around.
The fascists are steering the ship.
The grifters are cashing the checks.
And your name is still on the masthead.
You weren’t wrong to care about strength, or order, or American leadership.
You were just never supposed to hand it over to people who would burn the Constitution to feel powerful.
There’s still time to walk away.
Not from your values.
From those who’ve betrayed them.
The Hand That Built the Arsenal
The Warhawks didn’t hijack the right.
They were the right—for half a century.
They weren’t clowns or crusaders.
They were the adults in the room—the ones who thought about power not as spectacle, but as structure.
But while others shouted, they built.
They built the doctrine.
They built the infrastructure.
They built the machine.
And now?
That machine is in the hands of a movement that no longer believes in restraint, responsibility, or even reality.
The fascists don’t have to reinvent militarism.
They just have to redirect it.
The fake Christians don’t have to moralize violence.
The Warhawks already blessed it.
And the corporatists don’t need to create chaos to profit—
They just have to keep the war going.
The Warhawks are no longer in charge.
But the house they built still stands.
And the new tenants brought gasoline.
Up Next: Intermission — The Illusion of Change
From the outside, it looks like the right has transformed.
But if you think today’s movement is something new—
You haven’t been listening closely enough.
The song hasn’t changed.
Only the mix.
In our next section, we step back—not to pause, but to expose the machinery behind the noise.
To show how the Fascists, Corporatists, Warhawks, and Fake Christians didn’t just shape the coalition—
They’ve been cycling through its command.
Sometimes one leads, sometimes another fades.
But the track has been looping for fifty years.
Same agenda.
Same betrayal.
Just a different face on the album cover.
