Judge Temporarily Blocks Trump’s DEI Ban, Citing Constitutional Violations

DOGE (Department of Government EXTINCTION) TRACKER UPDATE

If You Believe in This Fight, Help Keep It Alive

The DOGE Tracker Update is right below, but before that I need just a moment:

This work isn’t backed by corporations. There are no ads, no paywalls, no billionaires funding it.

It’s just one person, fighting like hell to expose the truth and give you the weapons to push back.

If you value this work—if you want this movement to keep growing, keep calling out fascism without fear, and keep fighting for the future we deserve—then I need your support.

Join the fight. Become a supporter. Every contribution keeps this mission alive.

Because silence is surrender. We do not surrender. We are #TheRelentless.

---

DOGE v. The Constitution

🔴 UPDATE: February 22, 2025

Federal Judge Blocks Trump’s Attempt to Ban Federal DEI Programs, Citing Constitutional Violations

In a major legal victory against Trump’s authoritarian overreach, U.S. District Judge Adam Abelson has issued a preliminary injunction blocking the administration’s executive orders aimed at defunding grant recipients who engage in diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) practices. The judge ruled that the administration’s order likely constitutes viewpoint discrimination, violating First Amendment protections and the constitutional limits on executive power.

🚨 Key Developments:

• Trump’s DEI Ban Blocked – The judge ruled that the executive order targets organizations based on their speech and viewpoints, violating free speech protections under the First Amendment.

• Baltimore and Higher Ed Groups Lead the Challenge – The city of Baltimore, along with higher education organizations, sued the administration, arguing that the DEI defunding order exceeded presidential authority and unlawfully penalized institutions for supporting diversity efforts.

• AG Can Still Investigate, But Enforcement Halted – While the Attorney General retains the ability to investigate DEI practices, the court’s ruling prevents the administration from enforcing the defunding orders, ensuring that federal funds continue to support DEI initiatives.

🔍 Consequences:

• First Amendment Victory – This ruling sets a critical precedent against government efforts to punish institutions based on their viewpoints, reaffirming that the executive branch cannot dictate ideology through funding restrictions.

• Judicial Pushback on Trump’s Overreach – This decision is the latest legal setback for Trump’s administration as courts increasingly reject his unconstitutional orders, including those targeting federal workforce protections and educational programs.

• Broader Legal Challenges Incoming – This ruling invigorates ongoing lawsuits against other Trump executive orders aimed at dismantling civil rights protections, particularly within federal agencies, education, and defense programs.

📌 Sources:

• Memorandum Opinion – U.S. District Court, District of Maryland: Full Court Ruling on DEI Ban Injunction

• AP News: Judge largely blocks Trump’s executive orders ending federal support for DEI programs

• Reuters: US judge blocks Trump's bid to ban DEI by federal agencies, contractors

• Politico: Judge halts firing of intel agency personnel involved with DEI

Join the Fight, Amplify the Truth

Because silence is surrender. We never surrender. We are #TheRelentless.