Breaking — Democrats Block DHS Funding Until ICE Is Reined In

Federal agents killed American citizens. Senate Democrats are using the one lever they have—and Republicans are coming to the table.

While others stenograph, grift, or chase the next distraction
this is the news that matters and how it’s connected.

---

This is what fighting looks like.

The Senate failed to advance a six-bill spending package Thursday, 45-55. All 47 Democrats voted no.¹ ² ³ Not because they want a shutdown. Because federal agents killed Alex Pretti and Renee Good—American citizens, in an American city—and Democrats are demanding accountability before they fund the agency responsible.

“Until ICE is properly reined in and overhauled legislatively, the DHS funding bill doesn’t have the votes to pass,” Chuck Schumer said Wednesday.¹

Read that again. The Senate Minority Leader drew a line: no reforms, no funding. Democrats are willing to fund 96% of the federal government today.² They’re willing to pass the other five appropriations bills.² But the Department of Homeland Security bill—the one that funds ICE—needs to change first.

What Democrats Are Demanding

The reforms are specific.¹ ² ³ No masks on federal agents. Body cameras required. Warrants before making arrests—which would end the “roving patrols” where agents drive around stopping anyone who looks undocumented. Coordination with local law enforcement. A uniform code of conduct. Independent investigations when agents violate it.

These aren’t radical proposals. They’re basic accountability measures that any legitimate law enforcement agency should welcome. The fact that they need to be demanded—that they aren’t already policy—tells you everything about how ICE operates.

Sen. Patty Murray, the top Democrat on the Appropriations Committee, helped write the original funding bill.³ After agents killed Pretti, she said she wouldn’t vote for it without changes: “There must be accountability.”³

Republicans Are Coming to the Table

Here’s what makes this different from the usual shutdown theater: it’s working.

Senate Majority Leader John Thune acknowledged the talks have been “very constructive.”³ Trump, at a Cabinet meeting Thursday, said they’re “getting close” to a deal.¹ ² A Senate aide confirmed Democrats have been negotiating with the White House on a compromise: pass the five non-DHS bills, extend DHS funding short-term while reforms are hashed out.²

Even Tom Homan—Trump’s “border czar”—admitted at his Minneapolis press conference this morning that the administration has “recognized that certain improvements could and should be made.”² He didn’t specify what or when. But the acknowledgment itself is significant. The administration that refuses to admit any wrongdoing is now acknowledging problems—because Democrats are using leverage.

Why This Matters

A partial shutdown is still likely over the weekend. The House is on recess until Monday, and any Senate changes require House approval.² ³ But here’s the thing: even if DHS funding lapses, ICE operations continue. The agency received tens of billions from last year’s “One Big Beautiful Bill.”² ³ The White House can order employees to work through the shutdown.²

Democrats know a shutdown won’t halt ICE operations. That’s not why they’re doing this. They’re doing it to lock in reforms before they release their leverage. Democrats learned from the last shutdown that promises evaporate. They want legislation, not executive orders that can be revoked.³ Senate Democrats rejected GOP proposals to address their demands through executive action alone—because executive orders can be revoked the moment the leverage disappears.³

This is strategic discipline. Forty-seven Democrats. Zero defections. Unified around a demand that matters.

The Larger Pattern

Last fall’s 43-day shutdown was a disaster. Democrats caved.¹ They had leverage and squandered it, extracting nothing while millions of Americans went without pay or services. That capitulation emboldened the administration to believe Democrats would always fold.

This time, they’re not folding. The Minneapolis killings gave them undeniable proof that ICE operates without accountability—but it was the base that gave them the spine. Protesters in the streets. Constituents flooding phone lines. Grassroots pressure demanding their elected officials actually fight. That’s what turned “we’re concerned” into “no reforms, no funding.”

The administration wanted compliant funding. It wanted Democrats to vote yes and move on. Instead, it got unified opposition—and a negotiation it didn’t expect.

This is how you fight a regime that respects only power. Not by appealing to norms. Not by hoping for good faith. By using the leverage you have. Seven Democratic votes are needed to break a filibuster.² Republicans need Democratic help. That’s leverage.

Democrats are using it.

---

The Call

This isn’t an isolated incident. We track stories like this using the fascism syndrome—ten indicators that a democracy is sliding into fascism—so you don’t lose the thread in the daily chaos:

• Normalization of political violence: Federal agents killed American citizens. The administration’s response was to defend the killings, not investigate them. Democrats had to threaten a shutdown to get even an acknowledgment that “improvements could and should be made.”

• Erosion of due process: ICE operates with roving patrols, no body cameras, masked agents, and no code of conduct. Citizens are being killed without accountability. That’s not law enforcement—it’s occupation.

• Capture of the state: The agency that killed Alex Pretti and Renee Good would have received full funding without question—if Democrats hadn’t forced the issue.

Kill citizens. Defend the killers. Fund the agency anyway. That’s not governance. That’s fascism.

But we’re not here just to tell you the house is on fire.

We built this publication to equip you with the tools to fight back—the frameworks, the messaging, the strategies that actually work. See the links below. But we can only keep doing this with your help. If this matters to you, please consider becoming a paid subscriber. You keep the fight alive.

• Fighting Fascism: How We Push Back and Win — The strategic playbook for reclaiming power

• The Trump Regime Messaging Guide — How to talk to people who’ve been captured by the machine

• The Freedom Illusion — How we got here, and the counter-ideology that gets us out

1. Barbara Sprunt, “Senate fails to advance spending bills as Democrats push for DHS reforms“, NPR, January 29, 2026.

Coverage of the 45-55 Senate vote failure and Democratic demands for DHS reforms. Documents Schumer’s statement that the DHS bill “doesn’t have the votes to pass” until ICE is “properly reined in and overhauled legislatively.” Notes that the fatal shooting of Alex Pretti triggered the Democratic demands, which include barring masks, requiring body cameras, setting rules around warrants, and creating a uniform code of conduct. Reports Trump’s Cabinet meeting statement that they’re “getting close” to avoiding a shutdown.

2. Chris Stein, “Senate fails to advance spending package after Democrats refuse to back DHS funding“, The Guardian, January 29, 2026.

Comprehensive coverage establishing that Democrats are negotiating for a short-term DHS extension while reforms are developed. Notes that all 47 Democrats voted against the package along with 7 Republicans. Documents Homan’s Minneapolis press conference admission that “certain improvements could and should be made.” Reports that ICE operations would continue during a shutdown due to “One Big Beautiful Bill” funding. Includes the deaths of both Alex Pretti and Renee Good as triggers for Democratic demands.

3. Riley Beggin and Theodoric Meyer, “Democrats negotiating with White House ahead of potential government shutdown“, The Washington Post, January 29, 2026.

Details the ongoing negotiations between Senate Democrats and the White House. Reports that discussions have been “very constructive” per Thune but no deal has been reached. Documents that Democrats rejected executive order or separate legislation approaches—they want reforms in the DHS bill itself. Notes that Sen. Patty Murray, who helped write the original bill, now opposes it after the Pretti killing, saying “there must be accountability.” Lists specific Democratic demands: end roving patrols by requiring warrants, require ICE coordination with local law enforcement, create a uniform code of conduct with independent enforcement, require body cameras, ban masks.